Show of HandsShow of Hands

Show Of Hands December 25th, 2012 12:00am

Should it be illegal to make a gun with a 3-D printer? (3-D printers are devices that can "print" physical shapes/objects from digital plans. Functioning guns will be technically possible before long).

1 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

suppressedID suck it Kyle
12/25/12 10:03 am

3-D printers don't kill people. People with 3-D printers kill people.

Reply
Pragmaniac Hipsterville
12/25/12 10:09 am

Wait! Is this the first or second amendment? Then right to a free press or the right to bear arms?

The right to free arms?

Reply
Tony SOH Founder
12/25/12 9:26 am

I've added some explanation in the question itself. And here I thought *everyone* starts their morning by reading Popular Science magazine online. :-)

Reply
Strength
12/25/12 9:59 am

I'm a republican and yea it should be illegal! You can't just automatically say no when it comes to guns for everything!

Reply
2katz I live in Nebraska
12/25/12 10:19 am

Cool. I'm gonna print me up some more cats.

Reply
joshg USS Battleship Alabama
12/25/12 9:06 am

What's next? Make it illegal to draw a picture of a gun? How quickly we are willing to give away the things others gave their lives for.

Reply
freeedom New Hampshire
12/25/12 11:21 am

How far is your head up your ass that you have never heard of this?

Functioning pieces of guns have already been printed.

Reply
alyssa
12/25/12 9:06 am

That would kind of infringe on my right to free speech, wouldn't it...? If congress has time to pass legislation as stupid as this, it's time to cut their hours (and pay).

Reply
Brookee woo pig
12/25/12 10:03 am

That's a terrible idea! I dont think guns should be illegal, but printing your own gun? That's Crazy!!

Reply
suppressedID suck it Kyle
12/25/12 10:04 am

More than a few regulars who post on SOH will be buying their printers...to protect America.

Reply
RebeIFury76
12/26/12 9:40 am

Tell me HOW you will make it illegal?

Just like your pathetic laws make it impossible to make drugs? How about alcohol in the 20's, how did that work?

You liberals are the definition of insanity.

Reply
bruhman
12/25/12 10:27 am

Would a criminal care if it was legal or not?

Reply
jmofwiw
12/25/12 8:35 pm

It should be illegal to shoot people.

Reply
cowboy Dawns Highway
12/26/12 10:32 am

Liberalism is a mental disorder. Just remember that.

Reply
acdegroff
12/26/12 1:16 am

It should legal to make it, just like its legal to make a still. The use of the object is where you get in trouble. Im not pro or anti gun, but I am an American, and that part of me says F U to anyone telling me what I can and can't do in my own house.

Reply
geoag02 Dallas, TX
12/27/12 8:37 am

Since if you ban something no one will ever do it again.

Reply
Fact FL
12/25/12 10:03 am

This user is currently being ignored

Reply
bruhman
12/25/12 10:27 am

Laws keep only the good people honest

Reply

12/27/12 1:48 am

Let's make it illegal to cut branches off of a tree and sharpen them into spears, because someone may get stabbed. Absurd.

Reply
Sharknight
12/25/12 9:09 am

What the heck is a 3-d printer?!?

Reply
Zod Above Pugetropolis
12/25/12 6:42 pm

You can buy a kit from Cabelas to make a hand-cranked two-barrel machine gun, and plans online for a ten-barrel Gatling gun scaled to 22LR. Perfectly legal to buy, build, own, and shoot. As long as you don't put a motor on it (overwhelmingly tempting, just once), nobody cares. No problems so far.

Reply
jdengel
12/26/12 4:46 am

If you have the intelligence and means to create an actual model from a 3-D printer, you are intelligent enough to create a gun without the printer

Reply
susanr Colorado
12/25/12 11:13 pm

I'm not saying I LIKE the idea, just that it seems the laws should be consistent.

Reply
JennaF sunflower state of mind
12/25/12 8:40 pm

Yeah, because we don't have easy enough access to guns. (sarcasm, btw)

Reply
cowboy Dawns Highway
12/26/12 10:31 am

No? I don't know what a 3-d printer is but the Communists are already making it illegal? So it must be a no if it has them this pissed already.

Reply
cato Santa Barbara, California
12/25/12 11:08 am

Make it illegal. It won't matter. People are going to print guns. Technology trumps laws.

Reply
Jason19 New York
12/26/12 7:50 am

Not really. I've studied this for a bit and the quality is comparitively low. While it could and will improve, it can't produce he same quality as a factory and thus can't handle the other caliber ammunition or automatic use. Right now it can't even use metal, it uses plastics.

Reply
Doopy Remedial Americanism
12/25/12 12:32 pm

What's wrong with gun ownership being socially acceptable?

Reply
Zod Above Pugetropolis
12/25/12 12:44 pm

It's just an easy way to convert a plan into an object. The technology is not yet fully developed, but how is it much different than now, using CAD/CAM, or simple machining, which actually can create everything from barrel to screws, today? You can do your own gunsmithing at home; many hobbyists do.

Reply
derzeck
12/26/12 11:47 am

And criminals always abide by laws, right?

Reply
catslax
12/25/12 1:16 pm

Can't print springs, barrel, good luck getting a chamber than can withstand high pressures generated from firing. You'd break it by shooting it.

Reply
geoag02 Dallas, TX
12/27/12 8:34 am

Why not just ban murder?

Reply
susanr Colorado
12/26/12 9:14 am

My dad, a mechanical engineer, said he & fellow students in the 1930s used to discuss the idea of sending a vehicle to the moon (or maybe just into orbit around earth; I forget) but decided it would never happen because of inadequate fuel and/or materials. Never say never.

Reply
MrLove lovers, dreamers and me
12/25/12 6:14 pm

Wouldn't this be classified as an IED? Improvised explosive device.

Reply
Lulzy New Jersey
12/26/12 1:58 am

Nothing like Big Government sticking their nose up our asses.

I'll print counterfeit dildos and pink guns. Who's going to stop me? You can't make it illegal. It won't work.

Reply
ncbuc Get Over It
12/25/12 6:25 pm

I disagree. Yes, plastic would not be an ideal choice of material for any long term use. But for a one time, untraceable, and easily disposable purpose. It's perfect. And let's be real....if that's the criteria of what you need. It's probably not for "legit" purposes.

Reply
Fiddler Oregon
12/25/12 10:17 pm

*facepalm* Congratulations, you just made the top 10 stupid comments list

Reply
jacmcmaho
12/26/12 10:51 pm

Do you guys realize how much these things cost? Plus they aren't just giving these things to anybody my school had to fight hard to get on the list of buyers there aren't that many that you could waltz into Walmart and buy one so with the price and limited availability hardly worth it for a criminal

Reply
Doopy Remedial Americanism
12/25/12 10:20 am

Then you'll get strangled.

Reply
wetheslaves Live each moment fully
12/25/12 8:08 pm

We always get afraid of new technology thinking it will end the world. It will not replace everything. It is just a valuable tool that helps improve the way we do business. It is a great tool. We will still need manufacturing. It has limitations. We need rapid prototyping and modeling.

Reply
tbhcmh North Carolina
12/29/12 6:03 pm

Seems like it should only be legal with a permit and a reason. Commercially sold, for example, would be a reason. Making guns willy nilly with no gun permit and no registration of the guns should absolutely be 100% illegal.

Reply
PriorityShippin
12/25/12 10:35 am

that's not going to stop criminals from making guns

Reply
wetheslaves Live each moment fully
12/25/12 8:22 pm

We don't want people hurting themselves with inferior products that explode in their hands when they use them.

Reply
susanr Colorado
12/25/12 11:11 pm

..is the one making the gun, but I'd like to know what the LAW (or laws, if it differs by state) is. If that's all legal, then I don't see why printing one wouldn't be also, ignoring the fact that a working model can't be made at this time. But what are the laws on realistic-LOOKING "guns"?

Reply
Doopy Remedial Americanism
12/25/12 10:58 am

There's no way to make a gun undetectable. Between the chamber, the barrel, the springs, and the ammo there will be enough metal parts to show up on an airport scanner. That's without considering that the ammo smells explosive and the dogs and mechanical sniffers would pick up on it.

Reply
sccr28jb No No No
12/25/12 11:07 am

What mixture of meds did you have this morning to come up with this?....

Reply
JaquesV Bentonville, AR
12/25/12 9:19 pm

You watch too much CSI.

Reply
Doopy Remedial Americanism
12/25/12 9:12 am

Rapid prototyping machines (often called 3D printers have been used to build gun frames from files you can easily download from the Internet.)

The technology is not sufficient to print barrels, springs, many moving parts or ammunition yet.

Reply
davidwhite1 Building it Bigger
12/25/12 12:28 pm

As of yet there is no synthetic material that can replace a barrel. True, all other parts can be synthetic. But to fire an explosive projectile (ie ammo) you need the barrel to be steel, or better.

Reply