Are you in favor of Federal funding of embryonic stem-cell research?
They should use up the aborted babies first.
Why would anyone NOT be? They're discarded embryos from fertility treatments anyway. Might as well use them!
Yes yes yes!! I would gladly donate eggs to stem cell research for MS. I have it and if I could help scientists find a cure, I will do all I can!
Stem cells can be used without also using abortions to obtain them.
Lol. They don't come from abortions. They come from discarded embryos in IVF that didn't take.
He'll no. Y'all Yankee liberals need to get out of here with your damn "science". The real term is witchcraft, and you'll get lynched down here in bama for that shit.
I'm so confused why federal funding is such a bad thing. I work for a National Laboratory, our work is funded by the federal government. There are no private Particle Accelerators out there that even compete with my current lab. With over 2000
Employees and (about) 10000 users that use the lab every year, public funding keeps the transparency and the public access open. Without federal funding, the top quark would not have been discovered in the US when it had been. Keep finding science!!!
It's called crowding out. Not only was their science before it was federally funded - but it wad better. But even were this not the case, why should people be robbed to fund research? Sorry, you're not a scientist - you're a thief.
The federal govt's job is stated in the constitution... I'm pretty sure commercial research isn't listed.
Anyone who says no to this is not educated about the situation.
Actually, my education allowed me to read and understand the question. The question is whether tax payer $$ should be used. I can't speak for everyone that voted no, but I can tell you that my no vote is for keeping the government out of it.
For private research.
I just wanted to speak on behalf of at least some of the uneducated.
It's a better investment than medicine (which is chemicals) so do you not support any tax money going toward more advanced medical research than the traditional pill?
No. The government should not be investing money in any endeavors. Lower taxes and incentivize private industry. Private industry will always "always" be more efficient, and be more successful with their results.
I'm for getting result.
Sorry, but it's you whose in the dark here. i said no because I oppose Federal funding for everything. Private science is better, and better when not competing with an unlimited supply of stolen money, and science for political gain.
Gawd, repubs are such sheeple...do what your pastor and FOX tells you regardless how illogoical.
Says the knuckle-dragger who does whatever the government he kneels before tells him, no matter now illogical.
no, only private funding
The results of this one are encouraging.
Federal funding? No. Private funding? Yes.
No need. Science has found some non-embryonic stem cells just as effective.
the fwderal gov funding. that is funny thw feds don't fund anything. should read are you ok with your taxes being raised again for---------
To a point yes. I don't want to create new ones but use all the ones we already have. Plus the funding has to be matched for adult stem cell research.
I answered "yes" on this poll... Well, really only because there wasn't a "hell yes" option.
These cells can save lives. I don't know why people are so against it. Of course I support it and they should definitely move forward in the research of it.
The question isn't whether the research should be pursued. The question is whether tax payer money should be used.
Remember, some people don't believe in this based on religious grounds.
2. Stop voting in elections.
Why should I stop voting in elections? Just because our opinions don't agree?
Maybe we could stop paying taxes for something useless and start paying for something that could save life's.
Sorry. Somehow that comment that was aimed at someone else got posted as a reply to your comment.
The federal government has no business funding this or any program like it. If private industry wants to that is fine but not a government roll!
Based on pole results Republicans appear not to be very progressive.
It accounts for their failures to enroll young people in their party.
Stepping on the young and oppressing the unborn is now considered "progressive?"
You are clueless! The question wasn't a moral question of whether the research should be done.
The question is whether taxpayer money should be used.
There are 2 things I wish you would do.
1. Read and understand before you answer.
The Demokratskiiys in academia are enrolling them in The Party first. Remember the "Obama uh-huh uh-huh uh-huh" song? And teachers who blanket-fail students who disagree with the Pravda?
Yes, your version of totalitarianism is far more appealing.
Sorry pumpkin, but there is a growing strain of intelligent young people who realize the Democrats are just as bad.
"Federal funding" means the Feds pick winners and losers. Plus, private donations have always outdone public funding.
Let the private sector do it
Yes, but not now!!!! The government needs to pay off debt. I wouldn't support any spending increases unless its an absolute emergency
not now really tell that to people who have life threatening diseases
Sunset, tell that to the people paying crushing tax burdens, or whose jobs have been destroyed, or who die because the FDA decided the drug that would save them needs more testing. The private sector does everything better - except waste money.
When "stem cell research" was "ended" by the government, everyone began politician a non-issue. What wasn't reported is that the embryonic stem cells which were already harvested could be cultivated practically to infinity. There was no shortage..
What people fail to also get from the news is that advances using adult stem cells far outweigh those of embryonic stem cells.
Adult stem cells have seen tremendous practical value and embryonic have not. This is just another progressive attack.
Are people really so ignorant they think the only way to harvest these stem cells are from a fetus? It's called an umbilical cord people and guess what it contains....stem cells. You can donate them to science rather than letting it become medical waste.
kitty - Do you know the difference between embryonic stem cells and umbilical stem cells? I'm not ignorant; I have used (mouse) embryonic stem cells in research. There is a difference. Both may be useful, but you do not get "these stem cells" from an umbilical cord. Nor are embryonic stem cells...
..gotten from a *fetus.* They can ONLY be derived from 4-5-day-old very early embryos consisting of 50-150 undifferentiated cells.
Yes with heavy regulation
So much for Republicans being "pro-life"
stem research isn't synonymous with abortion....
Exactly. It is synonymous with curing people and allowing for ling & healthy lives. Yet, more republicans are against this than democrats. Makes no sense.
We are against federal funding of it. The government should not be involved in it!
CtYankee. Are you unable to read and understand? The question didn't ask if we were against using tax payer $$.
Where do you get off making assumptions about people like me.
I'm all for stem cell research. Without the gov't getting involved.
The question only asked about tax payer funds.
My terrible wording above.
Privatize it! Why is it the government's job to fund it? I'm all for science, but I don't think funding extra things will solve our budget deficit, or did everyone forget about that once elections were over and the media didn't have political interests behind their headlines?
I don't understand why so many self-identified Libertarians support Federal funding for this. I thought Libertarians would be against Federal funding of anything. Let private companies fund the research.
Because the benefits far far far outweigh the cost. Many lives would be saved and Libertarians are grounded in the "life, liberty & pursuit of happiness" belief. We don't believe in NO govt, just a govt that serves the people how it should
There is no benefit that can't be reached in other cheaper means. Get informed!!!
I'm for all sources of stem cells for research, personally I'll use the ones in my bone marrow to repair my knees
There's stem cells in the umbilical, not just a young embryo. In either case, it's one of our only routes to repairing spinal cord and nerve injury.
There's other places to get stem cells..
stem cells can help cure Parkinson's or something like that. of course. what would you republicans do if your parents had it, and stem cell was an option for a cure? say no?
Solves a lot of ethical issues.
Nope. That's just wrong on so many levels.
Cowboy! Jeez, have you been missed! So glad you're back!
I didn't think this app worked anymore. They must've fixed it.
Are you using the new website version? A lot of people are loving it!
No, I'm on the droid.
What type of levels? Explain please.
Absolutely. We're talking about research that could potentially save thousands of lives and cure many diseases. Why should an embryo that isn't even a human yet be put above the lives of those who already exist?
Embryos are human. They are are human in source and origin. They are not frogs or cats or water lillies.
Why do you, or the government, get to choose who lives and who doesn't?
Actually, what many don't understand, is that "embryonic" cells are not all embryos. We have stem cells in our bone marrow that can be used and harms no one. The mere term freaks people out. I do medical research and this can save lives, many at that. And I am a die hard republican.
peck - are you saying that the stem cells in bone marrow are *embryonic* stem cells? Because adult stem cells are not the same as embryonic stem cells, and I'm not aware of any embryonic stem cells in adult tissue. Do you have a reference for this?
"embryonic" cells are not all embryos."
I don't understand that phrase. Could you explain, please?
Meant to put cells and the "embryonic" was intended to emphasize how we don't need embryos to get these stem cells. They are the same cells Susanr
The government shouldn't be funding research, so no.
So who do you believe should pay for research?
It would be a bit of a reversal. They've been doing it since 1870.
research should be funded privately
I don't support this because scientists can already remove stem cells from adult bone marrow and umbilical cords. Some scientists have even transformed human skin cells so that they act like stem cells. I believe that if we put more emphasis on...
..alternative solutions, they will pay off in the near future.
Not no, but hell no! There ate other ways to obtain the cells. Do that instead.
I always used to be, but now science has evolved beyond the need for human embryos to obtain human stem cells.
All you republicans would change your tune if you had a blind child that would benefit.
I'm in favor of using federal funding to pay off the national debt.
"Are you in favor of Federal funding..." - the answer is always no.
If there are medical uses to be found, I say go.
Embryonic stem cells are unstable. They have never been successfully used in research. Our money and time should be used towards adult and placenta stem cells. That is where the success and breakthroughs are coming from.
Keyword being embryonic. Stem cell research? Absolutely in favor for. Embryonic? No, I'm not down with that.
Why do people think the government has to fund EVERYTHING. If there is promise in a technology, private companies will (and already do) dump billions into research. Let taxpayer dollars be spent on what it should be spent on: infrastructure.
Why does the government have to fund everything?
Because the government usually employs the best and brightest scientist. Private enterprise did not get man to the moon or build the first nuke.
Are you saying that only government employees worked on those projects? I could have sworn that the government contracts much of its work out..
It said fund, not employ. If they fund the right people it could be beneficial.
Government funded? No. Privately funded? By all means!
Of course. There are so many diseases and ailments that could potentially be cured - stem cell treatments are one of the most amazing medical breakthroughs of out time.