Show of HandsShow of Hands

MrMilkdud June 7th, 2014 2:59am

It is commonly accepted that celebrities have to deal with a higher degree of personal risk when going out into public. Should celebrities be allowed special permission to bring their own armed security personnel into gun free zones?

27 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

CSApride
06/08/14 9:26 pm

How about we don't have gun free zones and make guns legal everywhere, it's known that shootings happen in gun free zones

Reply
dralgo Ann Arbor, Michigan
06/08/14 5:10 pm

Nope. They can stay home.

Reply
jrrob CT
06/08/14 3:35 pm

Oh! Hell no!

Reply
WhoAreYou Up In The Trees
06/08/14 10:43 am

Absolutely. We all know that celebrities are completely responsible all the time...

Reply
MentalAlchemy TN
06/08/14 10:18 am

By going out, they take the risk. That's just going to encourage their protection to be more trigger happy. Why are they so special anyway?

Reply
halodad22
06/08/14 8:42 am

Eliminate gun-free zones. Problem solved.

Reply
hrankta
06/08/14 8:37 am

HELL no! Especially if they campaign against disarming the rest of us!

Reply
hrankta
06/08/14 8:39 am

And if they DO campaign for disarming the rest of us, NO ARMED SECURITY AT ALL! And the SAME FOR POLITICIANS!

Amplifiedsoul Arizona
06/08/14 5:06 am

No. They shouldn't get special privileges just because they are famous.

Reply
catpillow Florida West Coast
06/08/14 2:43 am

The law should be the same for everybody. I disapprove of giving special privileges to celebrities.

Reply
Ivyra Earth
06/08/14 8:54 pm

It's impossible to tell where to set the limit with that..how famous do they have to be?

catpillow Florida West Coast
06/08/14 9:30 pm

Exactly, if you're going to make an exception; it should be for danger, not for celebrity.

DavesNotHere where am I
06/07/14 6:10 pm

No. Don't go there.

Reply
rons Thanks America
06/07/14 5:41 am

Only the anti gun ones!

Reply
musiman28 Cotton country
06/07/14 5:37 am

Hell, they're some of the most vocal against guns. Why should we give them special treatment that they feel us common folk don't deserve?

Reply
Wackacrat Harford County
06/07/14 3:40 am

Oh the poor celebrities.

Reply
MrEdwin Mystery
06/06/14 10:46 pm

No, just regular bodyguards.

Reply
biggreen1981
06/06/14 9:05 pm

When was the last time a celeb was attacked/killed by the public?

Reply
DamageInc California
06/06/14 9:04 pm

What's the point of having gun laws then if the "celebrities" don't have to follow them also?

Reply
DamageInc California
06/06/14 9:04 pm

Their life is no more important than mine.

sadewt Rexburg, Idaho
06/06/14 8:42 pm

no, A) gun free zones shouldn't exist, and if that were the case this wouldn't be an issue.
and B) giving someone permission to bring guns into a gun free zone is admitting that they don't work and people are safer when they have guns.

Reply
sadewt Rexburg, Idaho
06/06/14 8:44 pm

I've got an idea. lets send Obama to go hang out in a gun free zone for a while, (leaving all of his guns behind of course), and see how well gun free zones work.

Diogenes Not Biden It
06/06/14 8:38 pm

All equal under the law applies to everyone. Except the monarch, of course. "I pass laws for everyone but me!"

Reply
chickencookie Biden crime family
06/06/14 8:16 pm

We are all at personal risk. Try asking the 3 that were shot dead (this year) at Ft Hood. Who cares about Beyonce? My life is valuable too.

Reply
swervin Maryland
06/06/14 8:35 pm

That happened because criminals don't follow laws. Gun free zones are, in essence, idiotic. It makes no sense to keep law abiding citizens from protecting themselves from unlawful ones.

swervin Maryland
06/06/14 8:12 pm

I vote no, mostly because I don't think celebrities should be treated as if they are gods. They are people too, they don't deserve it.

Reply
Rob Be Safe Be Smart
06/06/14 8:07 pm

I like the "should the GOP fight Obama on gun control" add in the link. Do people STILL think he's coming for their guns?

..and yes. Private security should be allowed to carry.

Reply
jimiscott Survivor
06/06/14 8:09 pm

Except for Rosie, she hates guns so bad that her guards should have to carry water pistols.

Rob Be Safe Be Smart
06/06/14 8:15 pm

Rosie doesn't need armed guards. That's like saying Godzilla needs a bodyguard.

jimiscott Survivor
06/06/14 8:17 pm

I'm afraid you got me there. Lol!

rebelfury76
06/06/14 8:03 pm

Like Emma watson? all that means is the rich have their own rules.

Reply
GlennBeck Becks inner thoughts
06/09/14 7:48 pm

Haven't you been paying attention? We do.

EarlyBird Portland
06/06/14 8:03 pm

They do, don't they? I thought armed, celebrity bodyguards got a pass to go anywhere.

Reply
MrMilkdud
06/06/14 8:29 pm

Do you mean celebrities who are bodyguards or bodyguards who guard celebrities?

EarlyBird Portland
06/06/14 8:39 pm

Bodyguards who guard celebrities :)

Diogenes Not Biden It
06/06/14 8:41 pm

Milk, are you checking that EBs blonde is root deep?

MrMilkdud
06/06/14 8:43 pm

Just asking for clarification.