Show of Hands

no, A) gun free zones shouldn't exist, and if that were the case this wouldn't be an issue.
and B) giving someone permission to bring guns into a gun free zone is admitting that they don't work and people are safer when they have guns.

That happened because criminals don't follow laws. Gun free zones are, in essence, idiotic. It makes no sense to keep law abiding citizens from protecting themselves from unlawful ones.

I vote no, mostly because I don't think celebrities should be treated as if they are gods. They are people too, they don't deserve it.

We are all at personal risk. Try asking the 3 that were shot dead (this year) at Ft Hood. Who cares about Beyonce? My life is valuable too.

The law should be the same for everybody. I disapprove of giving special privileges to celebrities.

I've got an idea. lets send Obama to go hang out in a gun free zone for a while, (leaving all of his guns behind of course), and see how well gun free zones work.

Rosie doesn't need armed guards. That's like saying Godzilla needs a bodyguard.

Oh the poor celebrities.

What's the point of having gun laws then if the "celebrities" don't have to follow them also?

Like Emma watson? all that means is the rich have their own rules.

All equal under the law applies to everyone. Except the monarch, of course. "I pass laws for everyone but me!"

Hell, they're some of the most vocal against guns. Why should we give them special treatment that they feel us common folk don't deserve?

And if they DO campaign for disarming the rest of us, NO ARMED SECURITY AT ALL! And the SAME FOR POLITICIANS!

Their life is no more important than mine.

When was the last time a celeb was attacked/killed by the public?

Except for Rosie, she hates guns so bad that her guards should have to carry water pistols.

No. They shouldn't get special privileges just because they are famous.

Absolutely. We all know that celebrities are completely responsible all the time...

Only the anti gun ones!

HELL no! Especially if they campaign against disarming the rest of us!

No, just regular bodyguards.

Exactly, if you're going to make an exception; it should be for danger, not for celebrity.

I like the "should the GOP fight Obama on gun control" add in the link. Do people STILL think he's coming for their guns?

..and yes. Private security should be allowed to carry.

I'm afraid you got me there. Lol!

Eliminate gun-free zones. Problem solved.

How about we don't have gun free zones and make guns legal everywhere, it's known that shootings happen in gun free zones

They do, don't they? I thought armed, celebrity bodyguards got a pass to go anywhere.

Nope. They can stay home.

Milk, are you checking that EBs blonde is root deep?

It's impossible to tell where to set the limit with that..how famous do they have to be?

No. Don't go there.

:oD

Oh! Hell no!

By going out, they take the risk. That's just going to encourage their protection to be more trigger happy. Why are they so special anyway?

Do you mean celebrities who are bodyguards or bodyguards who guard celebrities?

Bodyguards who guard celebrities :)

Just asking for clarification.

Yes.

Bunch of hypocrites.

Haven't you been paying attention? We do.