Are you naturally more athletic or artistic?
Way more artistic. Drawing, painting, singing, music in general, writing, poetry, etc. Lolol
Lots of my ancestors made their living as artists, and the ability partially passed on to me. I'm not athletic at all, though.
Neither. I can't throw or jump, and I can't color within the lines 😂😂😂
I don't see myself as either, but if I had to choose, I'd say athletic.
I'm only 20. That could have something to do with it. I'm the kind of guy that can smash a double quarter pounder meal and immediately go for a 6 mile run and still feel good.
I can't barely complete a stick person. Softball=my life⚾️
Since no wasn't a choice, I picked artistic. I'm pretty good at interior decorating, and used to be good at writing.
They're definitely opposing things for many people. I spent my weekend in a dorm at JMU reserved for visual/performing arts majors and when asked about sports the vast majority of us laughed or blinked or said "Sports? What are those?"
Who goes to church on Friday, are you Muslim?
Musically artistic, but I generally stay in shape.
Yes, I'd think so. 😂 But dance is still considered a performing art, and of the dance majors I met, most of them considered themselves unathletic. A few said they play soccer. I've never been much of a dancer myself, so I can't speak for any of them. 😅
Was raised Apostolic/Pentecostal. I'm not any religion now.
I am a little bit of both. I can't draw like the dc comics but I'm okay. I can do some pretty neat athletic stuff too.
I'm slow but can pack a punch or lay someone out in football and wrestling, and I can sing very well but I can only draw stick figures
Ah, you're quite handy. I still think in my opinion it's still more artistic than athletic. But I guess it can go either way.