If banning one reporter violates the 1st Amendment, then banning one firearm is a violation of the 2nd Amendment.
That’s objectively true.
This is absolutely and irrefutably true.
Great poll, Nemmy!
Wouldn’t even be true in reverse. It all comes down to the way everything is written
Parody argument: if the government is wrong to kill one reporter, they are wrong to kill one dataset
Gun regulation on who can own a gun or what gun they can have are in General unconstitutional.
I would disagree...
Just because you can't own an RPG does not mean you can't bear arms.
But if I was a member of the press and was banned from reporting news, I have had my right of expression taken away from me....
It is still a violation of the First Amendment to ban in RPG although it is notable that an RPG isn't actually banned.
Nonetheless the Hoops you have to jump through to acquire a firearm in the United States is still an infringement.
I should be able to own an RPG if I want one
I’m still savin’ up for a tank....
This user is currently being ignored
the founding fathers intended cannons. btw I know of a few privately owned talks.
You sourced the Second Amendment?
Are we talking about the Federalist Papers 29?
Oh you're talking about the literal Amendment you're an idiot
What if you just banned a reporter from the internet and not from print media?
No I said, what the founding fathers intended I didn't say.... God damn it.
The Federalist Papers are not law.
Hey idiot I said the founding fathers "intended"
Not what the Constitution says.... idiot
Read what I wrote next time before you're so quick to confirm your idiocy.