If banning one reporter violates the 1st Amendment, then banning one firearm is a violation of the 2nd Amendment.
I would disagree...
Just because you can't own an RPG does not mean you can't bear arms.
But if I was a member of the press and was banned from reporting news, I have had my right of expression taken away from me....
Gun regulation on who can own a gun or what gun they can have are in General unconstitutional.
This is absolutely and irrefutably true.
Great poll, Nemmy!
This user is currently being ignored
the founding fathers intended cannons. btw I know of a few privately owned talks.
It is still a violation of the First Amendment to ban in RPG although it is notable that an RPG isn't actually banned.
Nonetheless the Hoops you have to jump through to acquire a firearm in the United States is still an infringement.
Wouldn’t even be true in reverse. It all comes down to the way everything is written
Parody argument: if the government is wrong to kill one reporter, they are wrong to kill one dataset
That’s objectively true.
Hey idiot I said the founding fathers "intended"
Not what the Constitution says.... idiot
Read what I wrote next time before you're so quick to confirm your idiocy.
No I said, what the founding fathers intended I didn't say.... God damn it.
The Federalist Papers are not law.
You sourced the Second Amendment?
Are we talking about the Federalist Papers 29?
Oh you're talking about the literal Amendment you're an idiot
I should be able to own an RPG if I want one
What if you just banned a reporter from the internet and not from print media?
I’m still savin’ up for a tank....