Isn't Mrs Clinton really more upset because her corruption was exposed? The fact that the Russians may have been involved is really just a distraction!
I don't think she's upset that her corruption was exposed. She'd have to have a moral compass or a conscience to let that bother her.
I think she's upset that exposure cost her the presidency.
Does it matter? The question is fairly idiotic and, once again, perpetuates your need for validation by the right wing echo chamber. Just figured I'd spice things up. Expose you to different viewpoints. Allow for discussion instead of the "yeah fuck that bitch!" attitude after the election is over.
Why don't you focus on the corruption of the next President instead of her?
Trump has not done any legally corrupt actions, the article you sources show nothing of substance that is concerning, just like most "scandals" brought up about Trump, it's overhyped nonsense.
Also, think shares a fair point. The fact that the people who released the information (Which Assange says was not the Russians) is more important than the information itself in your opinion and many other liberals is saddening.
And let's get this clear: define pay to play. Does that article not fit this description? Buying time with the president and his overly influential family for a million dollars?
There's not enough evidence to show what the motives were of the inauguration dinner, and the source you've provided has received funding from people like George Soros, so I'm less inclined to believe it.
Please show me where the election results were majorly effected by any hacking.
CDFL ... dream on. I'm glad to forget all about the corrupt Mrs Clinton. She's swindled the country long enough. Thankfully voters have said NO WAY to more of her lies and deception.
CDFL ... you've shown yourself clearly. The good news is that at least for the next several years gnats like you will be relegated to the bleachers of irrelevance.
What're you talking about!? I get 4 years to complain and blame the government for anything that ever goes wrong! I'm relieved!!! That was the plan if you're crush (Hillary) won, is it not?
--
"We've had to listen to far too much of her" -Think
*asks 2 polls about her in one day* -also Think
irony: a state of affairs or an event that seems deliberately contrary to what one expects and is often amusing as a resul
The CIA also supported the Bay of Pigs and Operation Northwoods, and have done illegal actions to citizens, I'm not inclined to every believe they're working for the intrests of the United States.
Also, it's speculation. No report has came out giving concrete evidence that the Russian goverment hacked the DNC. Julian Assange reports he not receive the information from Russia. There is nothing that leads me to believe Russia did this.
Also, it wasn't the hacking of the DNC itself that influenced the elections, it was the material that was in those emails that influnced the election. Her own words hurt her, not necessarily Russia.
(And apparently most people doesn't include top ranking republicans who seem to care but what do they or the CIA or the FBI or actual experts know amiright)
I'm sorry, but the only one that seems to have an obsession here is you, look at your comments.
Also, you have given no concrete evidence that the Russian goverment hacked the DNC. None, only speculation. If Operation Northwoods was launched and the CIA said it was the Cubans who killed American citizens, would you believe them then? What if a top ranking Republican said it was the Cubans? Would you find them anymore credible?
Again, I find out experts credible. You don't seem to be a cyber security expert, but it's pretty hard for even our government to truly point to an IP address unless the hacker is a moron. But if all of our top experts, and high ranking senators on both aisles believe it, something seems wrong. It's "speculation" in the same sense the moon landing is "speculation"
If top ranking republicans said it was Cubans and the CIA said it was Russia, I'd say hmmmm, wonder who's right. But if they ALL say Russia, guess who it is!?
"Operation Northwoods was a proposed false flag operation against the Cuban government, that originated within the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff(JCS) of the United States government in 1962. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other U.S. government operatives to commit acts of terrorism against American civilians and military targets, blaming it on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba."
Again, if it weren't for John F Kennedy, this would have been approved and carried out. Would you have believed the CIA and FBI when they said they found "credible evidence" that Cuba carried out the act? Would you believe our politians as they would have rallied us to fight Cuba? The Federal Government is not looking out for your interests. They just adore people like you who think they're more "intelligent" because they read the Washington post for example, and believe the goverment completely.
Or perhaps Russia influencing our election. We're talking about today, not 40 years ago. We're talking about our highest officials, our CIA, our FBI, and our politicians on all sides.
That's quite the conspiracy theory you're peddling there. Let me guess, the democrats actually hacked themselves?
Also you never answered, is this just Think's second account?
And once again, she lost a month ago. Think says he's over it. Think asks 2 polls about it. You keep talking about her. You are the ones (one?) making her relevant
There's no difference, the organizations that were to carry these attacks still exist, what leads you to believe that they had a sudden change of direction?
I'm not supporting a conspiracy theory. It's a fact that the Federal Government almost killed American citizens to get into a war with Cuba. I don't think it's a little too much to believe they'd fabricate a claim that the Russian goverment hacked the DNC.
Hillary Clinton literally challenged the results herself, and joined the recount effort. She definitely was involved.
I don't care if think posted two polls about Hillary Clinton. She is a relevant political figure that lost the most electors in 100 years in the Electoral College. She is relevant for today at least, and she is helping to spread a narrative that the Russian goverment hacked the DNC. Regardless if you like it or not, she's been relevant enough in the past weeks.
Also, you're only making yourself look stupid at this point.
" I don't think it's a little too much to believe they'd fabricate a claim that the Russian goverment hacked the DNC" - about senators in both parties, the CIA, the FBI, and anyone with some expert knowledge.
You're not a conspiracy theorist and it's not ironic that those who care so much about Clinton are the ones claiming they don't ;)
Well played. You both look like clowns. Why don't you hop back on your other account and try again 😂
Here's the thing, once more since you're a having tough. Read closely.
I don't exactly trust the CIA, the same CIA that less than 40 years ago almost launched an attack that would have resulted in the deaths of many Americans, and blame on the Cuban government. This would have happened if JFK approved. Thar same CIA launched Project MKUltra which ILLEGALLY did experiments on civilians.
This isn't a conspiracy theory, these have been confirmed by the CIA with declassified documents.
Now, I don't believe that it's a little unreasonable to believe that the same CIA that carried out or almost carried out these actions would lie to the American public about who exactly hacked the DNC.
Please tell me what in my argument is irrational. If you can't, and resort to your regular comments with nothing of substance to them, then I'm inclined to believe you're a dumbass.
They didn't and most of those people are retired, if not all. Why would they, and the FBI, and top government officials, and security experts, and republicans, and democrats, and the list goes on, lie? Where's your evidence for that?
Our experts have the evidence. They are looking to gather more. You peddle conspiracy theories.
The have no evidence, they have released no evidence. What don't you understand about that? Show me the government document that has the evidence? It's all speculation.
It dosen't matter how long ago this was, there's been no major change in the CIA. Please tell me which reformation the United States went through that supported reorganization of the CIA. There was none.
😂 yeah all the parties mentioned before are operating on speculation. They have the evidence. Guess what, I can't show you because I'm not a security expert. I don't have it, they do. And once again, they seem keen on continuing to investigate it further. I understand you don't understand how the world works, but for now we wait until the documents become declassified. Sound good bud?
Otherwise, eep peddling conspiracy theories and believing whatever nutjobs feed you your bologna 😂
Thanks for exposing yourself! Good try try again later Think's second account ;)
Also no major change in the CIA 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 it's been 40 years dude. They didn't have computers back then. Everything has changed. You're laughable at this point.
Almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. And apparently the minds of conspiracy theorists
Think doesn't care about Hillary Clinton and is tired of hearing about her. And then has two polls about her in one day based on old, stale material.
Think's second account, the conspiracy theorist side of him, thinks because the CIA *almost* did something awful 40 years ago top Republicans, democracts, security experts, and our intelligence agencies are lying about hacking.
God I'm sorry got carried away. That's going to be wayyyy too much for you to take in. Let's keep it simple. Just one real question:
You think because the CIA *almost* did something awful 40 years ago top Republicans, democracts, security experts, and our intelligence agencies are lying about hacking?
Cmon nothink. You cant possibly be ok with trumps pay for play when all you did was hammer Hillary for accepting money for a charity. Remember when i told you were full of shit and not really concerned about that? You just needed something to complain about because your life sucks?
#mikedrop, #endzonedance
Also, to what conspiracy theory have I brought up? All that I said is true regarding the CIA in previous instances. Also, THEY HAVE NOT released any evidence to the public, only "trust us". I bet you're the same idiot who trusted them when they said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
uShady ... I do hate that Mrs Clinton used $200 million of the Saudis money to influence the election. That is a real scandal.
If the Trump family is involved in a verifiable scandal, I'll denounce them too. You've proven nothing. You've not denounced Mrs Clinton and you've not shown the Trumps in a scandal.
Show of Hands
Comments: Add Comment