Show of HandsShow of Hands

tdaddy August 3rd, 2015 7:34am

Considering almost as many innocent as guilty people are killed in police chases, do you think society would benefit more if chases were prohibited unless a chase involves a known or suspected felon? (No more 120 mph pursuits for running a light!)

5 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

PeppyHare Do a barrel roll
08/03/15 8:36 am

In my mind, driving at 120 mph to evade police is reason enough to suspect the person is a felon or to suspect them of it. So it's kind of a catch-22, if you run you're probably a felon which justifies pursuing the evader.

Reply
tdaddy Kentucky
08/03/15 6:05 am

When I read the article the impression I had was the problem isn't with law enforcement, the problem that suspects brings the chase on themselves. If suspects didn't run, most likely because of outstanding warrants, there wouldn't be a chase.

Reply
tdaddy Kentucky
08/03/15 6:11 am

It seems likely to me that a number of successful attempts to evade could be one of the reasons for at least some of the outstanding warrants.

geoag02 Dallas, TX
08/03/15 5:18 am

Only if there are other ways of catching the suspect that don't involve chasing them.

Reply
smarttexan More Moderate Than U
08/03/15 3:51 am

Prohibited even if it involved a felon. You can track cars without chasing them or could develop what was needed to do so easily.

Reply