Talren Solidarity Forever
11/06/19 4:56 pm
No. It entirely depends on context. Certain things lend themselves better to practical effects, and others lend themselves better to CGI. You’d be surprised just how many things you see in movies are CGI.
The reason people are so biased against CGI is because due to the nature of it, the only time you even notice that it’s there is when it’s bad. It’s very hard for people to appreciate good CGI when they don’t even know it’s CGI in the first place.
.
ctskapski x
11/06/19 2:44 pm
Generally, but it depends. At this point CGI can be used to render realistic shorts in real time (as in without any pre-rendering on a consumer graphics card.
Examples of this can be found in nvidia's 'reflections' RTX demo
youtu.be/lMSuGoYcT3s
Or in Unity's ADAM demos
youtu.be/GXI0l3yqBrA
Both of which are available in executable form, as well, if you've got the card for it (ADAM runs on my old GTX 960, and reflections runs on my 2060 Super) and both of which are, again, not pre-rendered.
So it depends on the skill of the artists and the resources they have.
But, generally, I still agree.
Comments: Add Comment