Do you believe the State Department gave unfair preference to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State?
Hillary Clinton is so unbelievably corrupt, it's truly difficult to even put into words. She literally could not care less about you or me.
It is just the way Hillary has operated for decades...cronyism and corruption.
Hillary Clinton says, "What difference does it make?"
Facts sure do!
No doubt with the Barry Soetoro administration.
"No evidence," you know, except the emails that leaked today showing the "pay to play" charge. Other than that, yeah the other 30,000 forms of evidence got deleted.
Clinton stopped lying we'd stop calling her out on it.
Duh! Is water wet?
At least 50% of democrats realize that she got beneficial treatment. The other 50% are mindless zombies.
Funny how there never seems to be any evidence and when there is a politically motivated witch hunt they can't seem to uncover anything credible.
If Republicans had real ideas or real candidates they wouldn't have to spend so much time making up phony scandals. They could win legitimately.
I used that statement against my boss today. He wasn't happy and it didn't help, I am pretty sure he's democrat, LOL.
Hillary has lived her whole professional & political life getting preferential treatment, she played the system, used her status in every phase of her life from First Lady, U.S. Senator, Sec. Of State, to enrich herself illegally with power & money. What is stunning, is how the press & her own Party have allowed her to get away with it !!!
No doubt about it.
Seems plausible, but nothing in this latest release of emails seems to suggest it, or even be related to it for that matter. You'd think if someone had evidence of improper activity by the former Secretary on behalf of the Foundation they would have come forward with it by now.
Dislike of a person does not prove guilt.
Only mindless sycophants would say no to this question. How obvious does it have to be - well I guess for Clinton it needs to be photographic evidence of a smoking gun with written confessions and eyewitnesses, but then the argument that would be the photo and documents were doctored by the vast right wing conspiracy.
I don't really understand how people can be so blind to the obvious regardless of political views.
Ok MJSeals. Quote the emails that show her conspiring to take money from foreign diplomats. Don't post a link. I want to read the cut and pasted passages that show "Pay for Play."
Don't try to weasel out. Copy the text. Show us. I'm waiting.
Do you even know what the State Department does? It's amazing how eager you are to accuse her of wrongdoing that you totally forget that it's the Secretary of state's job to "promote beneficial economic intercourse between the United States and other countries" and "provide information to American citizens regarding the political, economic, social, cultural, and humanitarian conditions in foreign countries."
If you are American and want to do business with another country IT'S THE STATE DEPARTMENT'S JOB TO ASSIST YOU.
If she refused you a-holes would have tried to impeach her for being anti-business.
By the way. Why hasn't Trump released his tax returns? I'd he worried that we will find out how much money he owes Putin's friends?
@irl comparing "releasing tax returns" to blatantly lying about emails, national security issues, Clinton Foundation pay-to-play is NOT the same.
I'm no fan of Trump, but you have to be clear about what's more important.
You can't find a single incriminating statement in 296 pages of emails? Maybe you should apply for a job with Rep. Trey Gowdy. He talked big too and came up with the same evidence as you did. NOTHING.
Unless they don't have a problem with her way of doing business.
I agree that they are all liars but I see zero evidence that she has learned from it and will be better. I would cut her some slack if she could just be honest -once.
She has not even admitted to misleading never mind lying. She says the issue is over because she took "responsibility" for it.
What responsibility did she take?
The only thing she learned was she can get away with lying and half apologies without substance.
Trump may not be any better but he can't possibly be worse than the last 8 years and 4 more of the same. Status quo does not cut it.
You need to learn how to play your cards better, sir.
Let's start with some facts on the economy - historic low workforce participation rate, almost 50 million on Food Stamps, doubled the debt in 8 years that took over 220 years and 43 Presidents to accumulate. Unemployment may have dropped because they stop counting those that do not look for work. Which lies does Trump say about the economy?
Illegal immigration is surging as evidenced by the "families" and "unaccompanied minors" pouring across the border and then they sit and wait to get caught so they can get in the system and go free without worry of deportation. They count turn aways at the border as deportations to jack up their numbers and it has
never been done before like that.
Those are the facts - like Trump or hate him, facts are facts.
Just saying as a DEMOCRAT I'm aware of these things and PERSONALLY I don't mind cause most politicians are shrouded in corruption and ALSO Donald Trump is equally shrouded in things that would not look good, possibly why he won't his tax returns, so it doesn't really bother me. I think she'll learn from this and try harder to avoid these things in the future PERSONALLY we all know about it we just don't care as much because all politicians are basically pieces of shit anyway not just her ;)
That's B.S. Cut and past something-ANYTHING-incriminating. Past it. Show me.
Wow jvl is a typical liberal. Gets presented with facts and calls nacho a troll. How open minded
Let me clarify he wasn't unhappy about me. It was something unrelated to me. I'm not the kind of person who will say what the boss likes to hear.
The master of multi-layered lies and his apt pupil. Lord, protect us from such monsters.
Good night -good chat.
No. Never would a govt. agency headed by Clinton was impartial lol.
So all succesful business people are necessarily corrupt to get to where they are?
Does that include Clinton Inc.
Bloomberg? George Soros? Al Gore? All the Democratic business people that support Hillary?
Be careful with your wide paint brush.
Just what I thought. No answers, no clues, no balls, no future.
Republicans can't see facts? Riigghhtt.
You...you're not an intelligent one. Not a surprise, the American political left appears to be having trouble with computers. You cannot copy and paste from a PDF unless you have appropriate text recognition software that Apple iPads, especially mine which is 7 years old don't have.
You asked for evidence I provided you with 296 pages of it. Every redaction is evidence of confidential material on a personal server (illegal) you can't copy and paste redactions either.
You have two choices. Either respond with an intelligent discussion as to the facts posted above or be found guilty of your own charge against the Republican Party of "ignoring facts" your text post will determine the continuation of this. I don't waste time on trolls.
Never mind the lying to ordinary people Hillary said three different times under oath "I turned over everything that could possibly work related" -since then more emails keep coming out that were work related.
Why is there not a smoking gun gun?
Delete, delete, delete.
Delete, delete, delete.
Repeat as needed.
Type the text from a single statement, from a single email in that long list of emails that shows Clinton involved with Pay for Play. No more excuses. You can type. Do it. Show us. Go ahead. The more you stall the more we see that you are full of it.
"Hillary for jail 2016"
I hate Donald Trump with a passion, your preprogrammed partisan arguments hold no water with me. And no, "Pay for Play" schemes are not legal. It is not allowed for a Secretary of State to use her position to take money from foreign diplomats for her own foundation. That's a fact.
If you would like to deny the fact go right ahead.
Lol you just said it yourself jvl. "What facts?". You don't have any facts. Defending Hillary Clinton is like the lowest intelligent thing you could do. Like seriously, it goes against logic and common sense. Hillary is evil
If anyone has it unfair its Donald Trump. Yes he has said dumb stuff and has been hated for a while but the media constantly try's to put him down, as long and as much as we don't like Donald trump we have to be reminded that the election should be fare as it is for Hillary
Parroting Trump, MJSeals wrote, "No evidence," you know, except the emails that leaked today showing the "pay to play" charge."
Still waiting for you to produce a single example of a pay to play email implicating Clinton. I'm not letting you off. Type or admit you're full of sh-t.
Gilbert Chagoury contacted a Clinton aid, not Clinton herself. Chagoury was passing along information about the political situation in Lebanon. There never was any contact, nor was there any action taken by Clinton on his behalf. There is NO PROOF OF ANY PAY TO PLAY.
It is not illegal for the Secretary of State to have contact with foreign nationals. THAT'S THE JOB OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, you partisan twit!
Republicans cry scandal every time anyone within 100 feet of Clinton makes or receives an email. SHOW ME EVIDENCE OF PAY TO PLAY. Unless there is something incriminating in the email then there is no scandal. I repeat, simply getting an email or sending emails is not a scandal. Pretending it just demonstrates how partisan you are.
Now, When am I going to get the answer to my question? Show me the text of the email that demonstrates Pay to Play. You have access to 296 pages of emails. Where is the smoking gun? Quote the email.
She's as innocent as the driven snow!
Obviously. She's in it for her. Get ready for corruption and gridlock beyond imagination if she receives the nomination.
I never said they were the SAME I'm saying that he hits her for being corrupt and u KNOW especially as a BUSINESSMAN he's done corrupt things to get where he is, hence trump university. THATS ALL IM SAYING and he lies just as much as her and polls also prove that so ;) THATS ALL I understand they aren't even remotely similar u are correct I'm just saying
Still waiting for the explanation about her duties to serve foreigners and facilitate meetings between foreigners and foreign governments.
You ranted about all this email stuff is just part of her duties -which duties cover that? Which State Department area cover foreign billionaires that "donate" to the Foundation dealing with foreign government contacts as part of her duties?
You have ignored the question 3 times because you can't answer it but declare there is no smoking gun and she is above board clean as a whistle.
As far as Sharia Law goes there is one candidate that has a high profile supporter that believes Sharia is above the Constitution and he was front and canter at her rally.
Quack quack goes the duck.