Two people have been shot at a university in seattle. Do gun free zone designations work? (No I have no shame in politicizing this since you liberal idiots have this blood on your hands and need to change your approach to this issue)
I'm a (mostly) liberal who is for gun rights, but to answer your question in an annoying fashion: what percentage of gun free zones have had a shooting take place? Sounds like an outlier event.
Thing are definitely not thinking like a normal person, I don't know if they choose it because it's a path of least resistance, or because high pop centers tend to coincidentally be more restrictive.
I believe there was a story of a newspaper posting what homes had a concealed permit and you could pin point what houses robbers chose NOT to go to....
With just one single exception, every public shooting since at least 1950 in the U.S. in which more than three people have been killed has taken place where citizens are not allowed to carry guns.
@pinky: agreed, that is with looking at. I'm guessing free zones are higher. It also begs the question is this relationship correlative or causative. I wonder if they are chosen or coincidental, considering the the people who do this sort of
It's true. Liberals have advanced this nonsensical idea that unarmed people create a LESS attractive target for murderers than armed people. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Perhaps not those who enacted the 'gun-free zones.' But blood is certainly on the hands of those who refuse to repeal them after the myriad of evidence that 'gun-free zones' are murder-magnets.
Comments: Add Comment