If everyone was prohibited from buying an auto insurance policy that doesn't include Liability, Collision, Incidentals, Rental Cars, and maintenance, would this benefit consumers, since they can no longer purchase an inferior policy?
I don't care what insurance they get as long as they have liability.
ACA is Liability for your body. You get that, right?
I'd be off the road
No. We've driven cars that were so old some coverage was just stupid. If car totaled no ins would give us more than fraction of fraction of premiums paid. We got coverage only to protect against injury & other driver. Made no sense to pay for other
Did you ask this for Barry
Some yes, all no.
Should that choice be taken from them?