Show of HandsShow of Hands

bringstheeagle March 31st, 2026 11:07pm

Is a a federal nationwide voter eligibility system a good idea to improve election integrity—or an overreach into state-controlled elections?

21 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

HoosierFan In my opinion.
Today: 6:08 am

Be careful what you wish for, Republicans. If Trump can issue orders to benefit his party in federal elections, the next Democrat in the White House can do the same.

Spoilers, POTUS can’t, only Congress has that power.

That said, the SAVE act would hurt the elderly and rural voters who favor the GOP, so this might bite them in the butt if it were ever to become law.

MountainWoman82 Spread Trans Joy
Apr 01, 2:28 pm

Women, Trans people and people of color are going to be the ones hurt most by this. Since you have to be a documented citizen to vote.

Reply
momofone61
Today: 3:46 am

So women are not documented citizens? People of color are not documented citizens? Please explain

MountainWoman82 Spread Trans Joy
Today: 4:02 am

Cis Married Women, Trans Women, & Trans Men which include people of color who have a differing name from what is on their birth certificate will not be able to vote. That or obtain a passport with the same name that is on your identification aka drivers license. States have made it impossible to get name and gender marker changes on birth certificates or mandate costly surgeries to do so. Also the federal government under Trump has gotten rid of the ability to have a passport that aligns with one’s gender but instead reverts to said gender assigned at birth. It’s a poll tax, and makes it impossible to some and very tedious, and costly to others.

In reality it’s only purpose is to get people to not show up because the ability to vote is a burden given the hoops they are wanting to inflict on those they deem subhuman, or their property given to them by God.

LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Apr 01, 2:04 pm

Neither. Is an okay idea, but federal election officials having the ability to audit States voter roles would be preferable and way more efficient under current standings Federal voting officials do not have the authority to audit a state.

And it is not an overreach The Constitution is perfectly clear on it.

Reply
LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Today: 2:38 pm

" time manner and place" generally constitutionally sits within the authority of states but broadly can be altered by Congress through law.

BeachSt Coastal Virginia
Apr 01, 12:44 pm

Horrible. Horrible. Horrible.

Reply
kattex
Apr 01, 12:04 pm

The dems would sue him if he sneezed the wrong way.

Reply
hudsondl
Apr 01, 10:34 am

Republicans think it’s a good idea having big brother with the records. Wonder what they will say when a Democrat is president

Reply
suppressedID destiny is right now
Apr 01, 9:13 am

It's Orwellian!

Fükk you, MAGA.

Reply
bnnt Los Angeles
Apr 01, 10:13 am

“How dare only US citizens should vote in elections!!!”

*angry lgbt+ noises*

theNobamist Support ICE
Apr 01, 12:44 pm

Where was your anger when Biden and the Autopen controllers were scrutinizing people’s lives phone records and tax returns to identify non-democrat voters for targeting?

suppressedID destiny is right now
Apr 01, 1:52 pm

It was right here. Just because you don't remember it doesn't mean that I wasn't saying that it was wrong and a bad precedent. I'm not sorry that I burst your assumption

LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Apr 01, 2:05 pm

Dont think you've even said that. At least not here. SID, you were defending Biden's mental capacity up until Democrats abandoned him at the president.

suppressedID destiny is right now
Apr 01, 2:08 pm

Wow, you are wrong on that, too.

Of course, since you personally can't remember it, it *must* not have happened. 🙄

For the record, Joe Biden's biggest asset was that he was NOT Donald Trump. Democrats completely screwed up in advancing his candidacy and covering up what was clearly declining capacity. So between the in aptitude of the two parties, I've never been prouder to be an independent.

LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Apr 01, 2:11 pm

"Of course because you can't personally remember it did not happen"

I'm pretty sure I didn't say that but thanks for putting words in my mouth.

LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Apr 01, 2:13 pm

You were in fact covering for Biden's declining mental capacity as it became more and more prevalent.

It's always interesting to have 20/20 vision and watch people contradict themselves.

suppressedID destiny is right now
Apr 01, 2:14 pm

Well, I know that I didn't say it, and you assert that I did. So I didn't really put words in your mouth as much I just called out your bullshit.

LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Today: 2:34 pm

Read my comment again. Really read it this time. Not what you think I implied but what was actually said.

EarthMunkey The Golden Rule. Always.
Apr 01, 8:11 am

National: It can say something like US Citizen, over 18, not incarcerated, mentally capable, valid ID...

Mental competency would be judged by a doctor. A lot like a murder trial. Everyone is generally competent and starts there. You don't get tested or anything. ...but if you are flagged for some reason by law enforcement, medical professionals or someone like that... You have to be screened before you can vote, or drive, or be near children... Let's be honest, most of these people are going to be in a facility already.

LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Apr 01, 2:07 pm

Its not an overreach,
Section 4 Congress
Clause 1 Elections Clause
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

ohm62
Apr 01, 6:42 am

Donald's lawyers already drafting a trust to place the USA in his family's inheritance. Sadly, they won't benefit of any "step-up in basis" as the father is actively and drastically dilapidating the overall value of this nation... That's going to be a cliff-down in basis for sure, if not abysmal.

Wasecan84 USA
Apr 01, 7:20 am

Are you saying that only allowing legal U.S. citizens to vote will somehow get trump (or his family) perpetually re-elrcted? I think more the opposite.

Wasecan84 USA
Apr 01, 5:57 am

The fact that we have to do that is a sad commentary on our current situation. Before the politically-motivated allowing of hundreds of thousands of foreign citizens to flood into the U.S. unchecked, and the subsequent steadfast refusal to allow any to be sent back, this wasn't necessary.

Reply
ohm62
Apr 01, 6:32 am

Not necessary at all, unless you live in Trump's La-La-Land. While all elections have their cheaters, and no system is entirely secure, the factual numbers demonstrate illegal immigrant voting is extremely rare and negligible compared to any amount necessary to actually change outcomes.

xzach next door to you
Apr 01, 5:00 am

If the government has you on a voter list or register they can also track your vote. Tracking your vote can also mean they can decide to remove you or manipulate your vote. Which eventually means one party rule.

Reply
Gunfighter06 Iowa, since 1846
Mar 31, 9:27 pm

I'm all in favor of election integrity, but I don't see how a national voter registry advances that goal.

Also, I dislike it because it gives the popular vote crazies a pathway to implementation. At the moment, a nationwide popular vote is a non-starter because it's not feasible under our current system.

People really need to stop and think about how laws can be used against them when the other guys inevitably take power.

Reply
bringstheeagle Colorado
Mar 31, 10:20 pm

Stop it my Heart can’t take this 🤣

bringstheeagle Colorado
Mar 31, 10:23 pm

Sadly I think this is partly true — “People really need to stop and think about how laws can be used against them when the other guys inevitably take power.”

As were likely headed into an era of tit for tat weaponization of policies in the name of balancing things out. Hopefully not but I think it’s likely.

bringstheeagle Colorado
Mar 31, 10:24 pm

I meant “particularly” true not partly 🤦🏻‍♂️

Gunfighter06 Iowa, since 1846
Apr 01, 1:41 am

My main b*tch is with voting by mail. Anybody besides the intended recipient can theoretically fill out a mailed ballot, and there is absolutely no way to prove fraud.

I would be willing to make Election Day a national holiday and allow in-person early voting - in exchange for nationwide voter ID, a ban on mail-in voting, and a ban on late ballots being counted.

shygal47 Florida east coast
Mar 31, 7:49 pm

Hmmm - well - Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, Barrett will be seeing this topic cross their desks 🤔watch how they decide for our Constitutional Rights, or for DJT/MAGA desires to have a Fascist nation.

Reply
hudsondl
Apr 01, 10:42 am

Do not need to wait for that birth tight citizenship was argued today. Not sure how it will.be decided but they did not slam the solicitor general

badattitude no place like home
Mar 31, 4:29 pm

Democrats don’t like it. Why is that?

Reply
WorstGooEver Nuke the Hurricanes
Mar 31, 4:55 pm

Because unlike you they follow the constitution.

TruthOverTrump Someplace
Mar 31, 4:28 pm

The party of small government 🤪🤪🤪

Reply
shygal47 Florida east coast
Mar 31, 7:50 pm

The Party of “transparency” 🤣😆🤭

zimmy Florida
Mar 31, 4:21 pm

MAGA loves intrusive government! 🤡

Reply
bringstheeagle Colorado
Mar 31, 7:30 pm

And states rights… unless Oh, wait 😁