Show of HandsShow of Hands

Doopy November 2nd, 2013 2:10am

Iran's nuclear program: civil energy production or nuclear arms production

14 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

sdbrev210 The Pursuit of Happiness
11/02/13 2:26 pm

Nuclear arms for the already expressed purpose of attacking Israel. Only a matter of time.

MCR The Moon
11/01/13 10:14 pm

You've got a sweet profile picture. That's an M1 Garand correct? I can't really see it that well

Reply
Doopy Remedial Americanism
11/01/13 10:28 pm

That it is! I put an Ultimak M-12 rail on it, and mounted a Leupold VX-III Scout scope.

Favorite. Gun. Ever.

MCR The Moon
11/01/13 10:35 pm

Nothing can compete with an M1 in my opinion. The M14 is close, but the M1 will always be my favorite rifle. Still planning on buying both though haha

cowboy Doors of Perception
11/01/13 9:39 pm

God help us if those crazy bastards get the bomb.

Reply
Happy Hong Kong
11/01/13 7:37 pm

A bit of both, just like every other nation's nuclear programs including the USA.

Reply
Liberty 4,032,064
11/01/13 7:15 pm

Probably both. I don't fault them for wanting what everyone else has. They see the international status that comes along with nuclear weapons.

Reply
gunluvr NOT a Gun Free Zone
11/01/13 7:22 pm

I don't think Israel will let Iran's nuclear program advance much more before taking it out ...

Doopy Remedial Americanism
11/01/13 7:34 pm

It's not both. They flare off enough natural gas every year to make up for four nuclear reactors. Energy is not an issue in Iran.

Liberty 4,032,064
11/01/13 7:38 pm

They flare off natural gas for two reasons.
1) They don't have the export capacity to ship it all out. That's why they're building the pipeline to Europe through Syria.
2) The gas gets in the way of oil production, which can be shipped by sea.

Liberty 4,032,064
11/01/13 7:39 pm

It's really the same reason natural gas is often flared off in the states.

Doopy Remedial Americanism
11/01/13 7:42 pm

Yes, but if they needed energy, they could use that gas to generate electricity. Wouldn't be hard. Certainly easier than building nuclear facilities in deep underground bunkers.

Liberty 4,032,064
11/01/13 7:49 pm

It is in those facilities because they are also developing weapons. That's why I said "both."

Doopy Remedial Americanism
11/01/13 7:56 pm

Still, you 'be yet to account for why they don't generate power from that natural gas. It would be easy.


They have more energy than they need.