If under a president's tenure, the deficit is cut in half, Government Consumption Expenditures decreases, total government employment falls by 600,000, and effective income tax rates drop, is this president's tenure fiscally conservative?
No, that's fiscally liberal. Conservatives only talk about small gov, all while actually making it bigger.
Not when the national debt goes up by more than double.
I answered no because everything that happens during a presidents tenure is because of the guy before him, right?
Also, where are you getting these statistics?
I know you want us to say Obama is conservative, but no veritas, he never was and he never will be.
And thank goodness for that!
Only if the amount of outstanding debt decreased. Debt outstanding matters much more thar a single year's deficit amount. If we're still borrowing money to pay for day to day expenses then the budget is unbalanced.
Not necessarily. It can but I'd need more detailed info
Sounds like a president that had a conservative house
Not if by "cut in half" you mean double first and then cut in half.... And it's still higher than when you took office
$1.2 trillion on the books the say he took office. $1.4 trillion peak after the second stimulus. $640 for the 2013 fiscal year.
That's funny considering the fiscal year runs from October 1 through September 30. That $1.4T deficit was in October 2009... 10 months after he took office... And after the trillion dollar stimulus that failed.
No he's obviously a communist/Socialist/Nazi Muslim born in Kenya
Thank you for acknowledging it.
Only if it confirms what I already believe.
I love it! You just got a majority of Republicans to agree that O is fiscally conservative. (Oh wait, am I not allowed to tell them?)
I wonder how many put yes and changed it after finding out what Veritas was talking about
It was 82% yes before I posted the comment revealing it. I checked 5 minutes later and it was at 60%.
You should have taken a screenshot. It is so sad that some people hate O so much, that they cannot be honest with themselves.
Like right now?
Lots of variables in this "hypothetical" scenario. I said yes based on cutting the deficit inherited by the prior administration. Employment could decrease quite a bit more, but it's a start.
You remind me of a poster named Nostromo who used to say stuff like that.
Is that a funny, RJ? I thought I left my location up long enough for all to realize I had changed names. Now I'm a cynic looking for an honest man!
Haha, do your unbiased non Nancy Pelosi research and see why those things occurred for the most part anyway. They are not because of good things Obama did. He will continue to go down as the worst president in history. 17 trillion and counting.......
The debt can't be directly controlled by the president because you can only lower the deficit so fast. When you start with a trillion dollar deficit and are still paying for the previous presidents wars and tax cuts wth is he supposed to do?
I'm not even talking about the debt, just put that number out there to show one of his many failures. I'm specifically talking about the poll numbers. No room or time to change unchangeable minds though. Interesting people still believe this guy and his pathetic leaders.
It's interesting when things go poorly it's all "this is Obama's fault!" but when things go well it turns into "Obama isn't responsible!". How can you have it both ways exactly?
Never said that at all actually, but ok.
Ot has been shown time and again that the Right has gone Swervingly right, and the Corporatist dems have become the old right- I'm talking Barry Goldwater right.
True Ender. My wife was so disappointed with Clinton because he was so conservative. She used to say he actually embodied "The Great Conservative Conspiracy." Her view - what better way to pull it off than disguise him as a Democratic Progressive.
Clinton wasn't liberal enough for me either, repealing the glass steagall act was a big mistake
Not to mention opening media ownership... and a dozen other "gifts"
Yes Roll again we agree. That was a big mistake.
Does this president increase the deficient to start his tenure?
Hypothetically speaking, he increases a $1.2 tril deficit he inherit to $1.4 with an economic stimulus and then cuts it to $640 bil. Hypothetically, of course.
Did he have any automatic spending cuts forced upon him?
No. He signed all budget agreements into law himself.
At this point why would we call him "conservative" if he lowers the deficit? That's what the last two dems have done, the "conservatives" are the ones who created the deficits that Clinton and Obama had to clean up afterward
Well now roll I didn't see this at first. I totally agree with your assessment here. Didn't get your sarcasm before. I thought you were serious lol.
Lol, I know it's hard to tell because some people actually believe that communist crap
I'm thinking Clinton or Obama. So who is the mystery man. I'd wager he's not a republican.
Let me put it this way. It's either Clinton or Obama and it's not Clinton. But don't tell anyone. We gotta keep the narrative going.
But how could it be Obama? He's a communist
There you go Roll with the ad hominem attacks. Lol. He's not even close to communist.
Should I have mentioned that was sarcasm?
Yep roll. I swallowed it hook line and twist of lemon. Love your comment above lol.
No rob Obama is a socialist not a communist
Oooooh, good one
Who is this amazing president? He sounds way better than Obama!