Sooooooo now that multiple people have testified there was definitely a “quid pro quo” Republicans defense now is that it wasn’t illegal? You can’t have it both ways.
The real quid pro quo was Mrs. Bill Clinton and her fraudulent Foundation that mysteriously plummeted in donations once she was defeated.
Take your Ritalin.
Literally the textbook definition of pay to play when all the fraudulent “polls” showed her with a 98% chance of winning. President Donald J. Trump wins in a landslide and bammo, all the money is gone. Coincidence? 🤔
You haven’t been paying attention.
There is no evidence of QPQ with the $$. There is no evidence that this is against Joe Biden. The QPQ of the meeting for the statement is “normal” between countries. The only first hand communication with trump, he said “I want nothing, no QPQ”. This is over
Except for all the evidence.
Devin Nunes face today, it said it all! There is NO DEFENSE. That’s why they attack the witnesses.
Um... no one attacked the witness.
Where are you getting this Sh.t?! Stop trolling
I think most reasonable people have been saying both. Today we heard opinions about it being QPP but no facts that I am aware of. (Must admit I was working so I am reading reports).
Also, nobody has been able to come up with a single law that was broken.
The dems house of cards is falling down once again.
Sondland: Was there a “quid pro quo?” As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes.
No one on the planet told him anything about a quid pro quo
Posco: The QPQ of meeting for statement is not unusual or illegal.
The dems are trying to link the aid $$ to the statement. Sondland and trump said No QPQ for that.
...after they found out about the whistleblower
Not one witness has direct proof that anyone ever asked for a QPQ, not that it would even be an impeachable offense.
That's not the defense I've been seeing