Show of HandsShow of Hands

ILY3000 November 21st, 2019 1:34am

Sooooooo now that multiple people have testified there was definitely a “quid pro quo” Republicans defense now is that it wasn’t illegal? You can’t have it both ways.

1 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

ScottyDoesNo Stand back and stand by
11/21/19 7:03 am

The real quid pro quo was Mrs. Bill Clinton and her fraudulent Foundation that mysteriously plummeted in donations once she was defeated.

Reply
ScottyDoesNo Stand back and stand by
11/22/19 9:29 am

Literally the textbook definition of pay to play when all the fraudulent “polls” showed her with a 98% chance of winning. President Donald J. Trump wins in a landslide and bammo, all the money is gone. Coincidence? 🤔

Diogenes FreeMeBe
11/21/19 6:34 am

You haven’t been paying attention.

Reply
ozzy
11/21/19 5:23 am

There is no evidence of QPQ with the $$. There is no evidence that this is against Joe Biden. The QPQ of the meeting for the statement is “normal” between countries. The only first hand communication with trump, he said “I want nothing, no QPQ”. This is over

Reply
snagglepuss2 Spring has sprung
11/20/19 10:22 pm

Devin Nunes face today, it said it all! There is NO DEFENSE. That’s why they attack the witnesses.

Reply
ozzy
11/21/19 5:23 am

Um... no one attacked the witness.

lj74
11/20/19 10:01 pm

Where are you getting this Sh.t?! Stop trolling

Reply
PhxLibertarian Phoenix
11/20/19 7:54 pm

I think most reasonable people have been saying both. Today we heard opinions about it being QPP but no facts that I am aware of. (Must admit I was working so I am reading reports).

Also, nobody has been able to come up with a single law that was broken.

The dems house of cards is falling down once again.

Reply
Posco BBQ Enthusiast
11/20/19 11:13 pm

Sondland: Was there a “quid pro quo?” As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes.

Malekithe My pronouns are GFY
11/21/19 4:30 am

No one on the planet told him anything about a quid pro quo

ozzy
11/21/19 5:26 am

Posco: The QPQ of meeting for statement is not unusual or illegal.

The dems are trying to link the aid $$ to the statement. Sondland and trump said No QPQ for that.

Posco BBQ Enthusiast
11/21/19 9:50 pm

...after they found out about the whistleblower

Malekithe My pronouns are GFY
11/22/19 3:31 am

Not one witness has direct proof that anyone ever asked for a QPQ, not that it would even be an impeachable offense.

mstt
11/20/19 7:51 pm

Faulty premise

Reply
BaxterSanchez Amarillo
11/20/19 7:34 pm

That's not the defense I've been seeing

Reply