Show of HandsShow of Hands

Shazam November 20th, 2019 4:25pm

IMPEACHMENT DAY 4: Do you think either side made a more persuasive case, and was anything said you found significantly compelling?

12 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

Suzan Hawaii
11/20/19 11:26 pm

When they say they have not talk to President Trump, the president of Ukraine, was NOT part of the phone conversation...They are not a witness.

geoag02 Dallas, TX
11/20/19 2:34 pm

I didn’t watch the hearing and haven’t heard any commentary on it yet so I will make my judgment based on the comments below.

Democrats are saying “we won!!” But not much from the hearing to back it up. Republicans are quoting the witness.

Reply
Posco BBQ Enthusiast
11/20/19 9:55 pm

Please watch or read articles on it and don’t rely on this or other comment threads. Twitter also has some solid journalists who fact checked it live; you can find journalists from both sides who do it.

I don’t think anyone “wins” though. Seems like we’re divided more than ever regardless of the outcome.

Robert0111 Oscar Romeo
11/20/19 2:09 pm

impeachment day? you really this is a stage show right?

Reply
DJAria Coushatta, LA
11/20/19 1:46 pm

The process isn’t over yet, so I’m not drawing any conclusions. Once it’s done, I’ll make my judgments.

Reply
4lph40meg4 Frustration, USA
11/20/19 1:32 pm

All of the Deep State traitors "feel" like something illegal or wrong was done... all are career politicians that have been feeding at the trough for much too long...

Reply
MadCow True GOP
11/20/19 11:43 am

This is what you get when you generate friendship from your checkbook.

ozzy
11/20/19 11:22 am

“I want nothing from Ukraine. No QPQ, do the right thing”.

Trump = innocent

Reply
thatguy2 We tried to warn you
11/20/19 11:24 am

What’s “the right thing”?

ozzy
11/20/19 12:00 pm

Fight corruption. The next sentence was “have Z do what he ran on”.

DJ13
11/20/19 4:20 pm

If he really wanted to fight corruption he would have started with his own administration....

DTinCA 42
11/20/19 6:04 pm

Trump used Guiliani to do his dirty work. That was clear to Sondland. They were to cooperate w Guiliani, who was clearly arranging QPQ, and “everyone was in the loop.”

rons WOKE is sick
11/20/19 10:58 am

All I heard Trump say to Sondland that he repeated after being asked what he wanted from Zelenkski “ I don’t want anything, I don’t want anything, Anything, no Quid Pro Quo!”.

Reply
Odysseus We All Need A Fantasy
11/20/19 10:46 am

My take on it is this.
Republicans and Evangelical Christians are now saying this:
Give us Barabbas! Crucify the Constitution!

Reply
4boot LaTrineodeur, MN
11/20/19 10:21 pm

Where do you see that? Wishful thinking much...

bnnt Los Angeles
11/20/19 10:29 am

Still mostly all made-up from the democrats. They know they don’t have an electable candidate next year so this is their only hope to damage trump.

It’ll likely have the opposite effect and he’ll win next year. And then they’ll talk into trying to impeach him again like they have every republican president for the past 60 years.

It’ll be 1,000x’s better if Democrats actually moved to the center. But that won’t happen.

Reply
Squidboy Snarkapottamus
11/20/19 10:16 am

Sondland delivered the goods. He’s wealthy....he doesn’t need ‘wingnut welfare’...he’s just trying to keep his ass out of prison.

Reply
lj74
11/20/19 11:17 am

πŸ™„πŸ™„πŸ™„
As I have said from the beginning, diplomacy=quid pro quo. All negotiators know this: something for something.
In Obama’s case the Iran nuclear deal was worth $160b; something for something.

thatguy2 We tried to warn you
11/20/19 11:25 am

Did the Iran deal relate to our election process?

WorstGooEver Nuke the Hurricanes
11/20/19 4:12 pm

Diplomacy doesn’t go through personal lawyers. Diplomacy isn’t used for the personal gain of the president.

Shazam Scaramouche, OH
11/20/19 9:29 am

Hey everyone. My current plan is to ask this everyday, but that will depend on how SOHers respond to it! I'm hoping there is a robust and respectful discussion on the developments each day. 

Let me know your thoughts on the hearing. Also, if you have a second whether, you think I should keep doing this series.


⚑

Reply
zimmy Florida
11/20/19 9:27 am

Absolutely, Trumps in deep πŸ’©

Reply
Bigray4 Read my eyes
11/20/19 10:54 am

🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣

zimmy Florida
11/20/19 11:05 am

Go ahead laugh, I’ll see you at the impeachment! πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸΏπŸΏπŸΏπŸΏπŸΏπŸΏπŸΏπŸΏπŸΏπŸΏπŸΏ

lj74
11/20/19 11:18 am

Zimmy:


πŸ™„πŸ™„πŸ™„
As I have said from the beginning, diplomacy=quid pro quo. All negotiators know this: something for something.
In Obama’s case the Iran nuclear deal was worth $160b; something for something.

zimmy Florida
11/20/19 1:03 pm

ODS πŸ™„I didn’t see Obama getting impeached. πŸ™„πŸ™„πŸ™„

snagglepuss2 Spring has sprung
11/20/19 1:52 pm

Deeeep πŸ’©πŸ’©πŸ’©

HoosierFan
11/20/19 2:12 pm

You guys underestimate how deep in the tank Senate Republicans are for Trump. I’ll be surprised if a single one of them votes to convict. They could care less about the truth.