“Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct”. (D) Mike Quigley. This says everything you need to know about Democrats.
It tells you a lot about political optics
Not everyone can have everything. He was able to testify to what he directly observed, which was a Ukraine policy being directed officially and unofficially. Just get the guy he said told him about the call to testify. And Vindman, who was on the call, as well as Sondland I believe, will also be testifying.
What a joke!
By not providing a real counter, I’m going to assume you have conceded.
I almost fell out of my chair when I heard him say that.
He needs to read, and understand, our Constitution
It would be funny if it wasn’t so pathetic.
You mean all that eyewitness hearsay? ...such an oxymoron!! 🤩
a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a first-hand description of it.
They have never met or talked to Trump. And they were not involved in the phone call. They were not eye witnesses.
Hearsay-information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.
That’s what it was. Contrary to what the left thinks, words actually do have meanings.
Sure, like being eyewitnesses to the unfolding conspiracy long before that fateful phone call. Corroborated testimony of the chain of events... never fear, the truth will come out. 😱
"Guilty until proven innocent", the Democrat way.