Show of HandsShow of Hands

jvl November 5th, 2019 8:19pm

Laws against robbery and murder have been in effect for centuries, but have not stopped crime. Should crime be deregulated and the free market be allowed to handle the individual security?

5 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

bringstheeagle Colorado
11/05/19 2:02 pm

😂 😆 😝 good one.

krazeelkyt Ohio
11/05/19 1:52 pm

Wow, this totally isn’t a blatant over exaggeration to try to make a certain group look bad based on your personal agenda. it’s TOTALLY not that at all.

11/05/19 3:02 pm

Nobody says anything when certain groups do it, but now it's something counter to most people on this app it's uncouth and a problem...

smartfart Florida
11/05/19 1:22 pm

I find most people’s arguments against certain laws are actually arguments against all laws.

jvl New Orleans
11/05/19 1:37 pm

Exactly. The argument that government is not 100% effective, so it must be completely incompetent. Without 100% compliance they claim chaos. Except lowering taxes. If 1% benefit and 99% don’t, then it’s a really good idea because trickle down or tax cuts pay for themselves.

Ebola007 Florida
11/06/19 6:40 am

Exactly. Just because the wall isn’t 100% effective doesn’t mean it’s not necessary. You’re finally starting to see reason.

smartfart Florida
11/06/19 7:55 am

The cost-benefit analysis from pretty much every expert on the topic says the wall is a loser. I don’t think anyone claimed it would be ineffective, though now we know you just need to spend $40 at Ace & have an extra 45 seconds to make it that way.

jvl New Orleans
11/05/19 1:21 pm

I’m curious how many people will say yes.