Rush Limbaugh identifies the whistleblower as Eric Ciaramella a CIA analyst and former National Security Council staffer who has served in both the Obama and Trump administrations as a career intelligence officer before Trump fired him.
This was known WEEKS before Rush ever said his name. I knew it two weeks ago.
Did a poll on this last week. Everyone knows who he is.
Haul him in with Schiff & expose them for the lying partizens they both are, then put them both in jail or hang them both for treason☠️☠️‼️
That seems to be the general consensus, but we won’t know until we know? 🤷🏻♂️
You mean until Schiff finally releases this info 6 months after the impeachment vote?
CD ... we will know this and SO much more when Mr Durham’s report is published. At that point this entire shampeachment will pale as the corruption of Democrats is made clear.
Desperate Democrats are pushing this shampeachment in hopes that they can beat the truth to the punch. They will lose, and lose big.
Conserv - I don’t believe the Whistleblower should ever be known, unless he or she chooses. What’s the point of a whistleblower than?
What if the whistleblower has an agenda?
Conserv- he or she does have an agenda, they believe the President has abused his powers. And the evidence is pretty clear that he/she was right. You al make much too much of the whistleblower, that was just the beginning since we have found the whistleblower was spot on, and more to come!
Think-nice conspiracy theory 🙄
Zim ... your desperation is showing!
So the end justifies the means is what I just heard you say....?
Or in this case the beginning justifies the means...
Think- actually yours is, you have been way off course with no coherent argument since this impeachment started, but don’t worry here’s a tissue! 🤧
Conserv- no I didn’t say that at all, I said the whistleblower just blew it all open, since then we have seen and heard more evidence of there was just the whistleblower, this would have been over by now, it’s only ballooned! 🎈
The of should be if.
“Conserv- no I didn’t say that at all, I said the whistleblower just blew it all open, since then we have seen and heard more evidence of there was just the whistleblower, this would have been over by now, it’s only ballooned! 🎈”
The problem is - the whistleblower has tied to Steele Dossier, the Putin fired Comey leaks and other leaks - plus they broke the law when they didn’t disclose to IG they were contact with Schiff.....also we have discussed this - interpretation is NOT a smoking gun. What details show anything more than diplomats interpreting things?
Also does Trumps actions of providing the aid have ANY merit in your eyes, despite the narrative of it being withheld?
Your eyes in regards to the aid being withheld?
Conserv- first off if he was tied to all of that, it doesn’t matter, there is plenty of evidence without him! That’s what I’m saying, and secondly I don’t know how you have all this magical information that he was tied to all those things? Sounds like right wing nuttery to me!
Interpretation is not evidence.....
“I don’t know how you have all this magical information that he was tied to all those things? Sounds like right wing nuttery to me!”
Unfortunately to your perspective it will be “nuttery” because it’s not from a credible location however this is because MSM has not moved the story yet.
I won’t post links - until it hits Fox News, because they will be the ONLY news that will report it much less put Eric’s name out there.
How do you feel about John Solomon? Is he nuttery?
Also side question.....if there was corruption around Hunter/Joe Biden, does this change things for you about the allegation of quid pro quo if you couple it with the aid hold/release timeline?
Conserv- yes let’s wait till reputable FOX goes with it and until we really know who the whistleblower is. Until it’s official nobody can say 100%.
And hell no it doesn’t change one thing if Biden was corrupt as they come. Trump and friends should have outsourced investigations to the state department and never should have gotten involved. Either Trump himself is completely corrupt or completely stupid!
John Solomon seems like a right wing conspiracy nutter.
So you impeach someone for being completely stupid??
That is an ehhh thing for me......stupid most certainly is not an impeachable offense.
I would say he is not stupid though........I think he is micromanaging the investigation efforts especially of the origins of Russian collusion was made up and attached to Trumps name by top officials in Obama’s camp........
“John Solomon seems like a right wing conspiracy nutter.”
Wow! Pulitzer winning nutter? Really? He is a contributor at “The Hill” “Washington Times” ??
That’s pretty harsh man - he is a top notch investigative journalist.....
Zim ... anyone who dares to disagree with you is not a “right wing nutter”. Your arrogance is laughable!
Sorry he was not Pulitzer Prize winner, but he did win Robert F Kennedy journalism award and the society of professional journalists national investigative award.
Sorry about that!!
Think- no, but anyone who is a nutter I call them out, left or right.
Conserv - you can have credentials and still be a nutter.
Conserv- and if your stupid a break the law you still broke the law.
No that’s fair, ignorance is not an excuse for breaking the law.
Can you name any other nutter writers on the right with presitegous investigative journalist awards?
I can’t.....how about we call him good with a right lean on his investigation...?? Nutter is tinfoil hat territory......good journalism rarely wear tinfoil hats?
CD/Think, I call this the “Zimmy syndrome”, the more facts & valid sources shown, he simply doubles down on his Leftist fake sources, & the more he counters using his simplistic self serving “Right Wing Nutters” phrase &🙄emoji, he constantly says these about me, along with a few more personal slights about my mental state & age, which both have actually served me well in separating🐂💩from truth & facts👍🏼‼️
Shippy- actually that exactly what you do! 🙄
Zim ... you’ve fallen far into the leftist abyss. You used to respond as an adult, and now as Democrats have become increasingly radical, your receded into a cocoon surrounded almost entirely by lies. It’s sad!
I used to look forward to our back and forth, but now you don’t even pretend to be honest.
Since the shampeachment started you have trafficked in nothing but lies and deflections. When your lies are challenged you simply deflect or run away.
Hopefully you will see how destructive you’ve become. I hope for a brighter future for you!
Not trying to pile on here and not hating on you Zimmy but as a simple observation, Think is not totally off the mark. You used to have indifferent viewpoints from time to time, but ..now your VERY much drinking the Democratic koolaid.
Again not doing this to be insulting, just wanting to say I have noticed a change in your responses as well over the past 6 months.
Conserv- I say it like it is! always have, you have to excuse Think though, this impeachment business has totally thrown him off balance!
Zombie ... tour tone deaf responses continue.
“Conserv- I say it like it is! always have, you have to excuse Think though, this impeachment business has totally thrown him off balance!”
So let me state this - you believe he did something wrong, I believe he didn’t do something right. In the past you used to argue a sort of middle track.
On top of that - I have seen you say that if the IG report is critical of Democrats and points to a conspiracy to stop the 2016 win by Trump, you would disregard it. That is not calling it like you see it - that is willful ignorance.
The democrats keep saying he did something wrong, but if you look at the whole action, what did he do wrong?
He was looking into corruption, he stopped aid, he had a conversation, Ukraine found out a month later the aid was held up, then released aid, then whistleblower made complaint......
When I lay it out that way, do you really look at that and say - yeup, he did something wrong or is it possible this coincidence was painted another color?
“I believe he didn’t do something right.”
I said this correct by the way....but doing something not right doesn’t always translate into something wrong/illegal. So no need to call attention to this.
Zim ... I’m not sure where the “Zombie” came from. I meant to say, as I always do, “Zim”.
The fact is you’re willfully ignoring the facts that MrT did nothing wrong with Ukraine. But worse than that, you have repeatedly said that you’ve shared the actual crimes “many times” and the truth is that you never have shared the specifics of even one crime that MrT has supposedly committed.