Are you pleased that Mark Zaid, the whistleblower’s personal attorney, is willing to allow his client to respond to written questions from House Republicans on the Intelligence Committee without going through committee chairman Adam Schiff?
Great news. Shut up the conspiracists.
The fear is that the dems made him do it.
The Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella WAS NOT in on the call. He was fired by Trump last year for leaking.
How do you know who the whistleblower is?
He works for Rudy Giuliani’s shadow government of course. Giuliani:Trump::Cheney:Bush
Trump knows what they want him to know!
BS, he will have shifty answer the questions.
Ray ... Mr Schiff will deny that he’s already seen the answers and he approved of them.
He should testify in person
I disagree. Whistleblowers should be anonymous to protect their safety and the safety of their families.
Frauds should not be able to make accusations and hide behind the veil of anonymity. There are other ways to protect them. This is a big kangaroo court just continuing the destroy Trump Russia collusion farce/coup
You seem awfully sure that Trump is innocent.
In person and in public
Trump is innocent. I read the transcript
If whistleblowers should be anonymous that means anyone could say or accuse anyone else of anything without consequences. That would also mean everyone would be guilty until proven innocent. Which is what Democrats obviously do believe.
That would be true if whistleblower documents went straight to congress, but they don’t. They go to the ICIG who interviews people in the complaint to hell corroborate the story. So no, it isn’t someone saying whatever they want to slander whoever they want.
Poly ... we don’t listen to leftists when it comes to real whistleblowers. Remember, MrO fired them and persecuted them. Now Democrats prop up political hacks/has-beens with no actual knowledge of anything, and call them whistleblowers.
Injectable, except when they don’t.
“CNN) The whistleblower at the center of the House's impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump first contacted the staff of the House Intelligence Committee for guidance before sending the complaint to the Trump administration, according to a spokesman and a new report.”
The complaint still went through the Trump administration before the inquiry.
It went through Schiff and he helped them write it.
The GOP cannot and must not be trusted with any process. The entire party is corrupt to the core.
Then why is Mr. Zaid allowing this questioning to take place?
I don’t know, ask him.
The reason why is because, barring any questions that would reveal the identity of the whistleblower, Mr. Zaid believes that allowing his client to answer the questions of the Republicans on the Intelligence Committee is in the national interest.
It demonstrates a willingness for the impeachment inquiry to be as transparent as possible, something that House Democrats so far haven’t been too keen on.
Yeah sure, let’s trust Devin Nunes. Perfect!
Mr. Zaid did, as did another of the whistleblower’s attorneys. Maybe you’re just afraid that the whistleblower will answer a question in a way that, while not compromising his/her identity, somehow doesn’t fit your narrative of what has transpired.
Rather than manufacturing a nonsensical conspiracy theory about my position, you’d be wiser to believe what I’ve already stated.
Look, as long as the identity isn’t compromised, I don’t care what Nunes or the rest of them ask the whistleblower. You’re far too paranoid. Maybe you should lighten up.
Maybe you should wake up to recognize just how dangerous the actions of the GOP are to the future of global democracy. Maybe that should be your focus.