Show of HandsShow of Hands

polster2 November 3rd, 2019 9:51pm

Are you pleased that Mark Zaid, the whistleblower’s personal attorney, is willing to allow his client to respond to written questions from House Republicans on the Intelligence Committee without going through committee chairman Adam Schiff?

6 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

rons on top of the world MA
11/04/19 7:06 am

The fear is that the dems made him do it.

FitzDarcy Earth
11/03/19 6:24 pm

The Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella WAS NOT in on the call. He was fired by Trump last year for leaking.

Reply
polster2 US
11/03/19 8:03 pm

How do you know who the whistleblower is?

Injectable Mojave Mo Problems
11/03/19 10:08 pm

He works for Rudy Giuliani’s shadow government of course. Giuliani:Trump::Cheney:Bush

Trump knows what they want him to know!

bigray Where Truth Rules
11/03/19 6:01 pm

BS, he will have shifty answer the questions.

Reply
Think Lovin Life
11/04/19 1:35 am

Ray ... Mr Schiff will deny that he’s already seen the answers and he approved of them.

Malekithe R lyeh
11/03/19 3:57 pm

He should testify in person

Reply
polster2 US
11/03/19 4:02 pm

I disagree. Whistleblowers should be anonymous to protect their safety and the safety of their families.

Malekithe R lyeh
11/03/19 4:50 pm

Bull💩
Frauds should not be able to make accusations and hide behind the veil of anonymity. There are other ways to protect them. This is a big kangaroo court just continuing the destroy Trump Russia collusion farce/coup

polster2 US
11/03/19 4:52 pm

You seem awfully sure that Trump is innocent.

mstt
11/03/19 5:22 pm

In person and in public

Malekithe R lyeh
11/03/19 5:23 pm

Trump is innocent. I read the transcript

STONEYTJONES Indiana
11/03/19 5:48 pm

If whistleblowers should be anonymous that means anyone could say or accuse anyone else of anything without consequences. That would also mean everyone would be guilty until proven innocent. Which is what Democrats obviously do believe.

Injectable Mojave Mo Problems
11/03/19 10:05 pm

That would be true if whistleblower documents went straight to congress, but they don’t. They go to the ICIG who interviews people in the complaint to hell corroborate the story. So no, it isn’t someone saying whatever they want to slander whoever they want.

Think Lovin Life
11/04/19 1:38 am

Poly ... we don’t listen to leftists when it comes to real whistleblowers. Remember, MrO fired them and persecuted them. Now Democrats prop up political hacks/has-beens with no actual knowledge of anything, and call them whistleblowers.

STONEYTJONES Indiana
11/04/19 6:14 am

Injectable, except when they don’t.

“CNN) The whistleblower at the center of the House's impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump first contacted the staff of the House Intelligence Committee for guidance before sending the complaint to the Trump administration, according to a spokesman and a new report.”

Injectable Mojave Mo Problems
11/04/19 7:33 am

The complaint still went through the Trump administration before the inquiry.

STONEYTJONES Indiana
11/04/19 9:10 am

It went through Schiff and he helped them write it.

LibArtie SW Connecticut
11/03/19 3:38 pm

The GOP cannot and must not be trusted with any process. The entire party is corrupt to the core.

Reply
polster2 US
11/03/19 3:44 pm

Then why is Mr. Zaid allowing this questioning to take place?

polster2 US
11/03/19 3:52 pm

The reason why is because, barring any questions that would reveal the identity of the whistleblower, Mr. Zaid believes that allowing his client to answer the questions of the Republicans on the Intelligence Committee is in the national interest.

It demonstrates a willingness for the impeachment inquiry to be as transparent as possible, something that House Democrats so far haven’t been too keen on.

LibArtie SW Connecticut
11/03/19 3:55 pm

Yeah sure, let’s trust Devin Nunes. Perfect!

polster2 US
11/03/19 3:59 pm

Mr. Zaid did, as did another of the whistleblower’s attorneys. Maybe you’re just afraid that the whistleblower will answer a question in a way that, while not compromising his/her identity, somehow doesn’t fit your narrative of what has transpired.

LibArtie SW Connecticut
11/03/19 4:11 pm

Rather than manufacturing a nonsensical conspiracy theory about my position, you’d be wiser to believe what I’ve already stated.

polster2 US
11/03/19 4:13 pm

Look, as long as the identity isn’t compromised, I don’t care what Nunes or the rest of them ask the whistleblower. You’re far too paranoid. Maybe you should lighten up.

LibArtie SW Connecticut
11/03/19 4:20 pm

Maybe you should wake up to recognize just how dangerous the actions of the GOP are to the future of global democracy. Maybe that should be your focus.