Show of HandsShow of Hands


Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
joshua16 January 30th, 2019 7:13pm

Given their periods, and emotional problems abound, should a woman be aloud to be a court judge?

Maybe No way
0 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

voc Hey
02/04/19 4:38 pm

Lol! I see you’re just a troll. Ok cool.

Troll on baby

Reply
LeftLibertarian The Age of Outrage
01/30/19 6:14 pm

I want to see the Judge Judy episode where she tears you a new one for this.

Reply
joshua16 FaceTime
01/30/19 6:27 pm

This user is currently being ignored

joshua16 FaceTime
01/30/19 6:29 pm

This user is currently being ignored

LeftLibertarian The Age of Outrage
01/30/19 6:42 pm

I was thinking more so you’re already in court and say this (you don’t have to be being charged, you can be the one suing for damages, it doesn’t really matter why you’re there)

joshua16 FaceTime
01/30/19 10:14 pm

This user is currently being ignored

John1 Florida
01/30/19 6:10 pm

😂

Reply
susanr Colorado
01/30/19 4:22 pm

Given their proclivity to violence, should men be allowed to be judges?

See how stupid that looks?

It’s really depressing that anyone still has the concept of women (with or without periods; you do know that some of us *don’t* have them, for various reasons, don’t you?). For crap’s sake, women have been very successful heads of a good number of countries (other than ours, of course). One of them just gave birth while in office a year or so ago.

My answer to your question is an absolute YES, which isn’t one of your answer options. There’s no “maybe” about it.

.

Reply
susanr Colorado
01/30/19 4:23 pm

And by the way, just who is it that *wouldn’t* “allow” women to be judges, anyway?

Men?

You do know that women are allowed to vote now, don’t you? Men don’t (completely) run the country any more.

joshua16 FaceTime
01/30/19 4:26 pm

This user is currently being ignored

susanr Colorado
01/30/19 5:22 pm

My comment about voting was in regard to the possibility of not “allowing” women to be judges. Directly or indirectly, there would be voting involved in changing that from the present state. You’d have to eliminate gender from the anti-discrimination list in the Constitution (Fourteenth Amendment), and changing an amendment is a *huge* deal.

Besides, aren’t you aware that people’s lives are directly impacted on a daily basis in *many* ways - by women as well as men? Nurses, doctors (including surgeons), police, and many others. (Would you really *not* undergo surgery by a female surgeon because of fear of “irrationality”? That’s irrational in itself.)

No, the proposition is just absurd.

.

TierasPet
01/31/19 6:45 am

Susanr, those are excellent points. I agree with you 100%.

handsyjo
01/30/19 2:28 pm

I think you're a lil young for this app..

Reply