Which SOH user do you find to be the most biased and tribalistic?
I nominate myself.
I live for controversy!
This is an inappropriate question. You should not call out users
And I was sure it was me🖕
I think the user is called “cowboy”.. on my most recent poll he called the LGBT community “perverts and child abusers that should be arrested for public indecency” 😬
Yeah, Cowboy is an irrational nut.
@Cowboy deserves an opportunity to defend himself.
Ter ... is the militant LGBTQIPA crew now embracing pedophiles? Is that perverted?
@Cowboy and @think are both irrational nuts that nobody takes serious.
@Think um no... why would anyone condone pedofilia? I’m just saying it’s biased because his comment fits the definition.
Axl ... dare to answer the question!
Ter ... are you certain that you haven’t missed the latest LGBTQIPA memo that includes the embrace of pedophiles?
Yes. My answer is you and Cowboy.
Um no.. @Think source?
Axl ... is the militant LGBTQIPA crew now embracing pedophiles? Is that perverted?
Ter ... so, if the militant LGBTQIPA crew is now embracing pedophilia, will you denounce them?
1. I don’t answer hypotheticals without being informed on the issue.
2. I don’t even know what you’re referring to when you use the term “militant LGBTQIPA”
Ter ... run away! You show that you have no spine. Of course you answer hypothetical questions every day. That’s a ridiculous excuse.
Who are you to say what alphabet soup defines the ever growing circle of deviants? In Canada, they call themselves LGBTQQ, among other ridiculous acronyms.
It’s a ridiculous excuse to pose the question instead of providing the source as I asked...
Ter ... your dishonesty is screaming!
@Think How am i being dishonest? I’m asking for you to provide a source which you have failed to produce.
Yeah and? What do you call people that get naked and perform sex acts in front of children in public parades besides child abusing perverts?
I don’t know what parades you’re going to, but I have not witnessed nor heard any reported nudity besides men in underwear if you count that, and couples kissing and holding hands, if you think that is a “sex act”.
None. I’m not a child abusing pervert forcing my disgusting beliefs onto children.
As a straight white male, I would be justifiably arrested if I got naked in public to celebrate my straight pride.
So if you had not witnessed this in person, are there credible unbiased articles that witness this?
It’s called the internet. It is this incredible new information superhighway that lets anyone see pictures and videos from all over the world. Isn’t that awesome?
I have been to a few pride parades, with my brother, and I have not seen nudity like cowboy describes either? , my guess is, it’s just his wishful thinking. 😝
Ter ... answer the question! You show that like most leftists, you have no moral compass, rather, you’re willing to change if told to change.
The question is, will you support the militant LGBTQIPA crew when they add pedophiles to their list of preferred deviants?
Yes, the internet is incredibly informative if you know how to look for unbiased factual reporting rather than hubris. I’ve searched the internet and found no reported instances of what you described..
Really, zimmy? I’m sooooooo shocked that you went to watch naked gay guys parading naked and performing sex acts, in front of children, in public. Ruining children’s minds really gets you people off.
Oh come on @Ter04 Teaching gay porn to children is obviously your thing since you’re so proud of it.
@Think me and the majority of members in this apparent “militant LGBTQIPA crew” you mention do not support and will never condone pedophilia, there’s your answer
Cowboy unlike you I am totally comfortable with my sexuality, and give my full support to the LGBT community! I think they are awesome! 🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈
Ter ... I’ll look forward to you eating those words as the next memo is produced and you see the disgusting pedophiles are your next “protected” and “maligned” deviant class.
You say that but admit to participating in gay porn, in front of children, in public parades.
If you can’t show children how gay you are in public, then what is the point of being so gay?
“Come on”? @cowboy these comments are appalling, I’m asking you to factually back it up as any intellectual would do in a debate, but maybe I was mistaken about you.
I know, @zimmy. You admit to participating in gay porn in front of children. You should be so proud.
Zim ... you are disgusting! You meany head, you’re discriminating against the other alphabet soup of deviants in the community by leaving them off of the acronym! How can you even live with yourself?!?
@Ter04 You admitted to participating in gay porn, in front of children, to show them how gay you are.
Stop forcing your disgusting beliefs on others.
Me: “Provide unbiased factual evidence for your claims”
@Think @cowboy: “you’re spineless,dishonest,child abuser, pervert, participant in gay porn”
Not sure how you can deduce that from my statement... the only thing you’ve shown me today is that you guys think way more about gay pornography, child abuse, pedophilia, and perversion than I have ever in my lifetime.. guess it’s not part of the “militant LGBTQIPA crew’s agenda”
You admitted to participating in gay porn, in front of children, in public parades to show how gay you are.
If you can’t show children how gay you are in public, then what is the point of forcing your perverted beliefs onto children?
@Ter04- you have to understand, Think is just a bit wound up and uptight about the LGBT community, and Cowboy is just an altogether loon( probably a closet case himself) both like to feel morally superior, when they voted and support a serial adulterer, who is also a sexual pervert deviant, so their morality is relative. I deal with Think another time, but Cowboy is best to just realize there is little hope for him.
Well someone has to think of the children. Just not in a sexual way like you perverts do.
Ter ... the militant LGBTQIPA crew never wanted to “live and let live”, from the beginning that was a lie. They want full domination and the extinguishing of any voices who dare to disagree.
I simply do not believe your cowardly assertion that you don’t respond to hypotheticals. If that were the case, then you wouldn’t be using this app! That’s simply dishonest!
1. I do not want domination, and I respect other people’s opinions. However the LGBT community is not protected under the Civil Rights Act so there are certain freedoms we are still trying to attain such as protection from discrimination when buying a house or applying for a job, both of these are legal to do in about 30 states.
2. If you actually read my original comment, you will see that I did not say “I don’t answer hypothetical questions”, but “hypothetical questions that I am not INFORMED about”... therefore I will not answer your hypothetical question about some hyperbolized “militant group” pertaining to a “memo” that I suggested you provide me, only to find out that it does not exist. Call me coward all you want but you should really read someone’s entire comment before unrelentingly bash them.
Ter ... sexual deviants is NOT a protected class and must not be considered one. It is also a disgusting deviances that has NO place in schools. None!
Think- so Trump should not be President, because he is a deviant
Zim ... I am not uptight about the deviant class. I simply want them to do what they say they want, which is to live and left live.
If they want to a lascivious lifestyle, that pain is on them. What they demand however, is to parade their disgusting lifestyle in front of my children and grandchildren. They demand to have drag queens in kindergarten and disgusting sex acts in schools.
Sex doesn’t belong in a school that I am paying for. Period. Not gay sex, not sex with animals and not even heterosexual sex. Students are there to become productive members of society, not self-indulgent lost souls.
The problem is that the militant LGBTQIPA crew are not satisfied unless they can indoctrinate all children. Their lifestyle is what had ripped apart major societies in the past and if allowed unchecked could destroy our society as well.
@Think well sadly I’ll have to stop this, because I don’t debate with people that cannot accept that I am an equal human. Kind of pointless if the only thing you got is saying how much superior you are than me and provide no factual evidence to back up these claims.. you don’t even know me, but because I’m gay you make all these generalizations and prejudices that I’m a sexual deviant and deserve to be discriminated against for something that I have no control over. Chao
Ter ...right on queue, you demonstrate precisely why this is a problem. Your definition of equal is the submission of anyone who isn’t a deviant.
You show again that it is not about equality, it’s about the dominance of deviance.
Please do not put words in my mouth, and read my comments. You said I should not be protected from workplace or employment discrimination. That does not make me equal, it also does not make me want to indoctrinate children, overpower people or be a “militant”.
Ter ... it’s curious that you’d accuse me of PRECISELY what you are doing! When did I say you shouldn’t be equal?
@Think I’m not accusing you of anything, you literally just said “sexual deviants are not a protected class and shouldn’t be considered one” therefore you say I, as a gay man, which is a sexual orientation different or “deviant” (as you prefer) from the societal heterosexual norm should be allowed to be discriminated against based on my sexual orientation when applying for housing, employment, or any protected rights for that matter.
Ter ... demanding that you are a protected class is an admission that you don’t want to live and let live. I am likewise not in a protected class, which shows that you and I are equals.
As I said,and as you just confirmed, you aren’t satisfied with equally, you demand specials class.
Presuming you are a heterosexual, you are not a part of a protected class (on sexual orientation) because heterosexuality is the norm, it’s not likely that one would prevent you from buying a house or a job position because of your sexuality. It is however more likely and actually occurs that an employer or relator can deny me a job or house because I am gay, therefore we are unequal in that sense.
Ter ... are you kidding? We’ve seen recently that foaming-at-the-mouth leftists refuse to sell a home to a conservative.
I like how you call me “normal” but are offended when I accurately describe you as “deviant”. These two terms are absolutely equivalent and not at all abusive or derogatory.
Again, you admitted that you demand special status above and beyond me. You prove that deviants don’t want equality.
Political affiliation is quite different than sexual orientation, however can you provide the article for the example you’re talking about?
I did not take offense to anything you have said to me, I’m not surprised with these comments because I’ve lived most of my life hearing them. To be clear I said you were in accordance “societal norms” since deviant implies the opposite.
What I did not agree with is that you say us “sexual deviants” are not a protected class , even though I can be fired for my sexual orientation and for no other reasoning.
At some point this has to end, I keep answering your questions only for you to misinterpret and twist my words to pose a similar question. We’re talking in circles
Ter ... NO! There is no difference between discrimination of you or me. Again, you reinforce your demand that you must be treated differently.
I say, you at NO different and need NO special dispensation. It’s time for you to admit that you demand special — not equal — treatment.
I would need to think about that one.......nah I don't think i can come up with anybody. Perhaps other people in the comment think they found somebody? Or maybe I'm just trying to think too hard for an example. Who knows?
Zimmy, my DemLibLeftist, sycophant posterboy & I think he actually relishes the title🤢‼️
@Think is so biased, if he farted, he wouldn't blame the dog, he'd blame the Democrats :D
Phaly ... that’s because it is clearly the fault of Democrats! I’m glad you can finally see it!
Hey, we didn't force you to eat those gassy Mormon Apocalypse rations.
Phaly ... settle down. I get that you’re particularly sore as you’ve been losing as the country’s been winning.
I’d like to nominate myself. Above all - I’m interested in Team Red winning. I’m not a principled conservative, I just want to win...by any means necessary.
I 2nd that!
Thanks dude. Teams need people like me. Fairness doesn’t win when the other side isn’t playing fair.
Na, we have agreed on a few things
LibArtie and DoctorWasdarb
I like both of them though.
Good picks. I agree.
Ov ... come on! At least give them a chance to respond ...
Probably libartie or mountaindewbob
Why not both?
Tough one to answer, I guess I’d go with STONEY, Think, or that Tilton guy, keep in mind I’m saying outright biased here, not just being partisan.
STONEY is a big one, true!
There was also that LibArtie guy that went of the rails a bit, that literal Nazi LegionofTruth, and also this guy called RagingMystic I really didn’t like who was an anarchist like me, but none of them are particularly relevant now as far as I’m aware.
I’m not biased I just can’t stand liberals. 😜
Axl ... from you that’s a complement!
Lefty ... it’s cowardly to talk about people behind their backs! You should summon who ever you call out so they at least have a chance to respond, unless you really are a 13 year old girl ... and then, we’ll, the expectations are even lower!
Is Legion even around anymore or does he have me on ignore?
Honestly I thought there was no point in pinging and I’ll explain why, I didn’t remember one of their names, the ones in the second comment aren’t active anymore, and that left only Think and Stoney, and I’ve already made it clear to them what I think about them.
He has me blocked so I can’t really tell
He blocked me too lol
I haven’t seen him much lately.
Pepsi- he may have blocked you. He’s here every single day.
That explaines it.
Oh I was blocked by him ages ago! 🤣😂🤣😂😂
If you take a stand and don’t agree with him he blocks you.
Nice, now I can say shit to him directly.
Think, it’s nice of you to call Bob in but he has everybody in this thread blocked.
EarlyBird ... oh, that’s too bad for him!
Think- be sure to tell him, the libs say hi!
For the record, LibArtie is just as bad.
Zim ... maybe you big meant heads should be a wee bit nicer.
Think- come on, I’m always nice, you know that.
Zim ... most of the time you’re a swell, even reasonable sometimes. But when you talk about people behind their backs, you’re a meany head!
@kscott for sure!
Wasdarb, zimmy, PepsiDude, myself.
Hey sometimes I agree with conservatives, rare yes, but on occasion.
I think all of those users are reasonable people, not overly biased
There have been unconfirmed rumors that I agree on conservatives on some things.