Show of HandsShow of Hands

cowboy May 31st, 2018 8:25pm

Google listed “Nazism” as the ideology of the California Republican Party ahead of Tuesday’s statewide primary elections. Do you think this strategy will harm or help Democrats?

3 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

ozzy
06/01/18 2:29 pm

I see a lawsuit coming

Reply
JudicialJedi321 2000 Mules
06/01/18 10:04 am

This kind of BS is bound to hurt the left. Google should be ashamed of itself for throwing in with that scum.

Reply
ozzy
06/01/18 2:29 pm

Google is a democrat tool. They helped obama light the Arab world on fire 🔥

cowboy Proud Father
05/31/18 5:43 pm

I hope the Democrats keep this up and keep showing everyone just how insane they really are.

Reply
cowboy Proud Father
05/31/18 5:44 pm

I also hope that Conservatives don’t follow the insanity down the rabbit hole and fight them.

ComradeJames nationalism
05/31/18 4:06 pm

Accusations of Nazism don’t put right-wing whitey parties at a disadvantage at all, especially these days. The cracker nationalists (sorry, alt-right) will come out of their parents’ basements to vote for you en masse.

TomLaney1 Jesus is Lord
05/31/18 3:32 pm

Great new profile pic! Where'd you find it?

Reply
cowboy Proud Father
05/31/18 3:43 pm

Thanks. In some random Star Wars rebel pictures.

geoag02 Dallas, TX
05/31/18 4:48 pm

Shouldn’t the symbol for the resistance be Ω?

mstt
05/31/18 2:35 pm

Google and Facebook cannot be trusted.

Reply
chickencookie disgusted
06/01/18 6:20 am

I haven’t been on FB since Zuckerberg lied I mean testified.

political Georgia
05/31/18 2:05 pm

Help especially in California

Reply
rons Thanks America
05/31/18 2:02 pm

Communist do those things.

Reply
Twinkeys Minnesota
05/31/18 1:58 pm

Strategy? It's just compiling information from Wikipedia. Nobody did this on purpose, somebody probably vandalized the Wiki article.

Reply
Robert97206 Portland Oregon
05/31/18 2:01 pm

'Nobody did this on perpose'

Hahahhahaha sure thing. Somebody hasn't compared to Google's definitions to actual definitions of words before have they?

Google has always chosen a left-leaning definition to terms.

Twinkeys Minnesota
05/31/18 2:08 pm

Nobody at Google is physically typing the information into those things. An algorithm does all of the work taking the information directly from Wikipedia. Here's a link to the edit one week ago where somebody added "Nazism" to ideology a week ago. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/842714790
If you look at the changelog, it was removed 23 hours ago. This is clearly how it got there. Nobody did this on purpose.

cowboy Proud Father
05/31/18 2:14 pm

You mean “someone”, a week before an important election, went in and changed the California Republican Party’s ideology to Nazism? I’m sure it was an innocent mistake. 🙄

Twinkeys Minnesota
05/31/18 3:09 pm

Lol, I literally just proved to you that it was some random Wiki user's fault for vandalizing the article and Google had nothing to do with it, but keep denying reality if that makes you feel better.

Robert97206 Portland Oregon
05/31/18 3:11 pm

This is Google we're talking about how are you so sure that Google didn't vandalize Wiki's page?

cowboy Proud Father
05/31/18 3:13 pm

Yes. You proved it could’ve been a Democrat operative slandering the California Republican Party a week before the election. Congratulations.

Robert97206 Portland Oregon
05/31/18 3:16 pm

"Nobody did this on purpose"

How do you vandalize wiki on accident?

Twinkeys Minnesota
05/31/18 3:20 pm

I think your guys' Tinfoil hats may be on too tight. There is no evidence to support your wild claims. Not everything is a conspiracy.

Twinkeys Minnesota
05/31/18 3:21 pm

I meant nobody at Google did it purposefully.

cowboy Proud Father
05/31/18 3:22 pm

You have no evidence that it wasn’t a Democrat operative, or a Goggle employee either. So calm down before climbing into to that high horse.

cowboy Proud Father
05/31/18 3:23 pm

*onto that...

Robert97206 Portland Oregon
05/31/18 3:23 pm

& ad hominem to you too bruh.

Twinkeys Minnesota
05/31/18 3:48 pm

The burden of proof lies on the one making the claim, not the one dismissing said claim. Anything asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

cowboy Proud Father
05/31/18 4:11 pm

“Nobody at Google is physically typing the information into those things.”

Can you prove that claim?

Twinkeys Minnesota
05/31/18 5:01 pm

You need to prove that somebody at Google was behind it or it is assumed nobody was. This is how our justice system works, innocent until proven guilty and not the other way around.

cowboy Proud Father
05/31/18 5:04 pm

I’ll take that as a no. You can’t prove your claim.

pof
06/01/18 12:25 am

Cowboy is correct. Since you can't prove a Google employee didn't do it, that means they did.

cowboy Proud Father
06/01/18 6:28 am

Thank you, sweetheart! ❤️💕😍

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
06/01/18 7:43 am

This user is currently being ignored

Robert97206 Portland Oregon
06/01/18 8:05 am

Burden of proof goes both ways, unless we are in the court, if you have an claim its your burden to proove it.

ladyniner81 extremists are a cancer
06/01/18 1:00 pm

People have been doing that shit to Wikipedia for years. Minor shit, like putting goofy stuff on someone's page. Nothing major.

pof
06/01/18 1:37 pm

Mr. Google himself personally edited that Wikipedia page

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
06/01/18 2:51 pm

This user is currently being ignored

Robert97206 Portland Oregon
05/31/18 1:32 pm

Help, sheep follow each other.

Reply