Show of HandsShow of Hands

Show Of Hands March 9th, 2013 3:00pm

Would you prefer to live in an all-cash economy?

0 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

pinkiron
03/15/13 8:23 am

Heck ya, make it rain, make it rain!!

aciscol concord, ca
03/13/13 7:00 pm

If we lived in a cash only world we wouldn't have to worry about banks and companies ripping us all off every day

xplayman New York City
03/12/13 11:12 am

I'm in favor of dropping cash for credits. Credits would be earned not manipulated by printing new money and having value of an object. The gold standard needs to be replaced by the labor standard. Show me what you do not what you have.

xplayman New York City
03/12/13 11:14 am

The time standard is also interesting but I don't like that it does not reflect work load. If you haven't heard of it it basically pays you based on time working. You work 8 hours in a day so you get paid 8 hours, milk might cost you 15 minutes.

rodin South Dakota
03/11/13 7:02 pm

yes, eliminate food stamps.

Reply
jaded82 Earth
03/11/13 1:05 pm

Yes. I hate being tracked and my purchase history shared with spammers

thirdcoastkook
03/11/13 5:58 am

Credit cards are the devil....

TheAntiLib Dutchess County, NY
03/10/13 7:30 pm

Cash should be eliminated. The illegals could not work, drugs could not be purchased, everybody would pay taxes..no more under the table. Then hopefully, tax rates will be reduced because of the higher revenue. I doubt it.

Reply
guy_fawkes Failed System
03/10/13 1:51 pm

I want an economy base only on the exchange of goods and services. Cash is as reliable as Monopoly money and plastic is even worse!

Reply
2ndafe Flat lands of Ohio
03/10/13 11:35 am

Yes. It would drive down prices on many many things. People tend to over spend when debt is easy and cheep.

Reply
ravens1 Birdland
03/10/13 8:11 am

no, the city folk would rob us even more

Reply
Rosebud Ohio
03/10/13 6:46 am

Unless there was still a way to make internet purchases and bill pay, plus financing things like a house, no. In today's society, they're quite important. Especially as it means I don't have to drive an hour+ to try and find clothes, for example.

winner
03/10/13 3:21 am

Would we finally be back on the gold standard?

smacc DunningKruger
03/10/13 3:28 am

I don't think that would work. It isn't plentiful enough to match wealth.

NUwriter
03/10/13 5:46 pm

Smacc, any naturally arrived at supply of money would be sufficient.

Drathic Over Yonder
03/09/13 9:56 pm

You can have an all-cash personal economy right now if you choose

Reply
Vincere Seattle
03/09/13 9:32 pm

The closest thing to a real world example is Japan. They have a cultural preference towards cash; outside of big cities most places of business don't accept credit or debit cards. It works well enough for them.

Reply
RebeIFury76
03/09/13 8:49 pm

Only if the cash is backed by commodities. Fiat currencies don't last long.

Reply
billyboy55
03/09/13 8:18 pm

GOLD STANDARD!????????????????

Reply
skschroen always at school
03/09/13 8:17 pm

You actually save money using cash, spend an avg 1/3 less on basics like groceries

Reply
skschroen always at school
03/09/13 8:16 pm

If by all cash you mean laissez faire then yes

osouless Whats Next
03/09/13 8:11 pm

No since idk exactly what that means. ????

kellyw The Mississippi Delta
03/09/13 8:00 pm

For everyday purchases, yes. But living in rural Mississippi, I would be lost without online shopping for certain things.

Reply
gmw
03/09/13 7:44 pm

A vehicle, home and medical procedures are the only things that should be financed....everything else should be cash...if you don't have the cash for it don't charge it!

gnott15 22401
03/09/13 7:44 pm

What about checks or electronic transfers?

For those of us who do business with larger amours of money. Also for patrol and international travel/transfers

jtopo Istrouma
03/09/13 7:46 pm

If you mean all cash, as in no credit or debt, then yes. If you mean no methods for electronic funds transfer, as in no debit cards or Internet banking, then no.

Reply
RayX quit
03/09/13 7:26 pm

A hidden cost in credit cards is that the banks are making so much money that they are not interested in business loans.

Reply
JackTorS Clap you stupid bastards
03/09/13 7:23 pm

We should really be living in a resource based society and get rid of money all together.

susanr Colorado
03/09/13 7:31 pm

You mean... like... <shocked expression> communism?

JackTorS Clap you stupid bastards
03/09/13 7:43 pm

No, just get rid of money. Completely.
We have the ability to manufacture everything we need. If we concentrate on technology to make life easier for people, money would be unnecessary.

susanr Colorado
03/09/13 7:50 pm

But how would people get stuff, and who would do the work?

JackTorS Clap you stupid bastards
03/09/13 7:02 pm

Current technologies would allow things like housing, transportation and agriculture to operate at near full automation with minimal human intervention.
As soon as we stop concentrating on making money and start on the welfare of humanity we'll be better off.
Money truly is the root to all evil.

susanr Colorado
03/09/13 7:20 pm

Sounding like communism to me. The little-c kind. I think I like it.

That saying originally was "the LOVE of money..."

kianiwaters Somewhere Over There
03/09/13 10:31 pm

Also real The Host. Love it!

SugarShaq
03/10/13 6:47 am

So, a house would build itself? Including all plumbing and electrical work?

JackTorS Clap you stupid bastards
03/10/13 7:55 am

Search and watch "The Venus Project" on YouTube. Jacques Fresco goes into great detail on how all this can be possible.
He makes a lot of sense in what he proposes.

JackTorS Clap you stupid bastards
03/10/13 8:26 am

When you realize how much crime is centered, either directly or indirectly, on money, ridding ourselves of it would solve a majority of problems.

mabbou Omaha
03/10/13 8:50 am

Money is just the means to power which is what causes a lot of misfortune around the world. If we rid ourselves of money people would find other ways to take advantage of people.

JackTorS Clap you stupid bastards
03/10/13 11:43 am

When money is eliminated from the equation, there really is no means for an individual or group to gain control over people.
Or at least a very low probability.

NUwriter
03/10/13 5:48 pm

JaclTorS, tell that to the Pol Pot's victims. He eliminated money, and still managed to control people. The truth is that all groups looking to eliminate money are looking for power.

NUwriter
03/10/13 5:49 pm

Money is not the problem. A government-created bank that can create money out of thin air is. But money as a medium of exchange is required for a complex economy.

adam2890 Denver
03/09/13 7:07 pm

I would rather live in an economy based on sound money and the gold standard.

Reply
WhatsThatSmell Florida
03/09/13 6:58 pm

Ditch credit cards. Keep debit cards. If you don't have it, don't spend it. Of course, there should be certain exceptions such as housing.

Reply
CharlotteMassacare
03/09/13 6:55 pm

It would be cool but I get a little thrill when I buy something with change. Like penny candy, as a little treat or something from those quarter machines at the supermarket. Those things sure kept a lot of younger siblings quiet

ziplock
03/09/13 6:16 pm

What a preposterous question. No! Next...

susanr Colorado
03/09/13 5:01 pm

I'd prefer to live in a no-money economy, but that's hard to do when you're the only one.

Reply
dawl adulting
03/09/13 6:00 pm

Totally with you- I wish more people would be open to trade and bartering.

RayX quit
03/09/13 6:08 pm

Bartering for a single malt scotch would be difficult for me. You probably have more to barter with. I'd be offering a stand up routine. Old fat guys aren't that funny.

kianiwaters Somewhere Over There
03/09/13 10:33 pm

My areas women's groups do a lot of trade and barter. It's fun!

RayX quit
03/10/13 8:08 am

Can your ladies take a good joke?

Doopy Remedial Americanism
03/09/13 4:58 pm

It's fiat money. Whether it is paper or plastic makes little difference.

Reply
bchrome
03/09/13 4:23 pm

An aside here... OPEC was created the same year that we stopped backing our dollar with gold. Not a coincidence. If you were buying oil with actual gold, it would cost us pretty much the same as in the 1970's.

Reply
smarttexan2 Extremism Harms
03/09/13 4:14 pm

All cash plus barter, yes. It would balance out society and stop corporations and a few wealthy people from holding America hostage. Plus, it would really allow a capitalist economy to flourish.

Reply
Ummmmm
03/09/13 4:14 pm

No way. Don't want to count money every time I buy something. Paying with plastic so much easier. And easier to keep track of your expenses too.

Just have to be responsible about it. Don't charge ur credit card if u can't afford it.

mjohn620
03/09/13 4:50 pm

Lol yeah, that addition and subtraction is tough stuff...

Catman62
03/09/13 4:13 pm

Not unless someone comes up with the cash equivalent of credit card reward programs. I earn hundreds back every year by strategically using various credit cards.

Reply
07evurma Petoskey
03/09/13 4:07 pm

All cash would be great. America is in trouble because we spend money we don't have. If you can't pay cash you can't afford it. Poor people think they can afford it by asking ,"what is the payment?" Rich people ask,"how much does it cost?"

Reply
auraelys The answer is 42.
03/09/13 4:53 pm

Did you purchase your car straight up in cash? Your house? I completely agree not to buy things you can't afford, but it's going to be a long time before I can bank enough money to buy a house straight out, even one in my affordability range. :/

AndrewJ1025
03/09/13 4:57 pm

Houses are actually cheaper if you pay in full. That interest can add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Rosebud Ohio
03/10/13 6:42 am

Uh, not always. My husband and I are quite poor. We have only had payments on services or debt repayment (like school loans). Paid for our cars with cash. It's not based on someone's income but their money sense. I know plenty of "rich" who ask about payments, not affordability.

Rosebud Ohio
03/10/13 6:44 am

Not to mention we moved back in with my parents so we can save to buy a house, with at least 10% down, and pay off all debts and increase credit scores. And of my husband gets into the police academy (high chance), we'll be able to do so before the baby on the way is born in September.

patrioticteen
03/09/13 4:01 pm

Better for a stable economy, but not so good for the consumer.

Reply
centexken Republic of Texas
03/09/13 3:56 pm

All cash sounds good but who could afford a house if you had to pay upfront? If we had to pay cash upfront most of America would be living in one room shacks.

Reply
commonsense America isnt racist
03/09/13 3:48 pm

I agree it would hold you more accountable for your purchases, but there's something to be said for banks and investing. Weather it's gold/stock/property.

And what about mill/billionaires?
All that cash? If I wanted to buy a 20million dollar house do I rent an 18 wheeler to transfer the money?

Reply
praetorianus65
03/09/13 4:24 pm

Any physical material as opposed to just numbers.
You can transfer it as diamonds.

praetorianus65
03/09/13 3:27 pm

It would force us not to spend money we don't have and stop counting unhatched chicks.
The government, too.

Reply
RNftm The Fire Swamp
03/09/13 3:03 pm

I don't mind debit cards, but I live without credit cards. Sure, I may not have all the fancy crap my friends have. But I also don't have the piles of debt that they do.

Reply
rons screw politicians
03/09/13 3:02 pm

Such a simple question. Live with money, no credit cards, no debit cards, no layaway plans, cash on the barrel head! You'll have to save up for your junk!

Reply
hippiedude fields of green
03/09/13 2:44 pm

I prefer to live in a non cash economy. But I kno thats a long shot

Reply
kistopear123
03/09/13 2:02 pm

There is nothing wrong with the way we use our money. If people prefer cash, they are going to use it. I prefer debit so I use debit, mainly because I have carrying around change.

Reply
RayX quit
03/09/13 6:03 pm

I briefly got a card because I thought I needed it for gas but a $300 limit card got about $50/month in fees - $35 ever time over limit.
It's better to put $300 in your wallet than a $300 card. The same is true with a higher limit. Cash in the pocket is always best.

RayX quit
03/09/13 2:01 pm

Credit Cards are for suckers.

tommysq Chicagoland
03/09/13 2:28 pm

If you use them right, they have fantastic benefits.

EarlyBird Portland
03/09/13 2:59 pm

Agree w/tommy. Credit cards are your friend if used properly.

yellow9 Alabama
03/09/13 3:10 pm

I agree with Tommy. If you are responsible in using them, they have great benefits.

tommysq Chicagoland
03/09/13 3:16 pm

Yep. My credit card rewards get me best buy gift cards which get me a new tv every couple of years.

RayX quit
03/09/13 3:32 pm

Credit like alcohol can be enjoyed or easily abused.
You have to remember when you are dancing with the devil.
I wish I had all the credit card fees that I've paid through the years.
The free trips to Europe on points were nice but truth be known, expensive.

07evurma Petoskey
03/09/13 4:10 pm

You play with snakes, they will bite you. Nobody says the secret to becoming rich is by banking frequent flyer miles.

susanr Colorado
03/09/13 5:00 pm

Suckers? How am I a sucker? I pay for almost everything with a credit card. I pay my entire bill every month. I don't buy things frivolously, so just having the card available doesn't mean I buy anything I wouldn't buy with cash. What's the problem?

RayX quit
03/09/13 5:23 pm

Susan: I'm sure you are very responsible but:
There are a lot of young people that owe a years salary to credit cards, pay 30% interest plus fees. They have been sucker punched with the the attraction of quick stuff. They would have more stuff if they didn't have the fees. They fell in a trap.

susanr Colorado
03/09/13 5:31 pm

Absolutely. They're dangerous for anyone who can't control their spending (and paying), and people may not know they lack that control before they get loose with one - or seven. I just didn't like the blanket "for suckers" claim because a lot of people do fine with them.

RayX quit
03/09/13 5:39 pm

Didn't meant to offend you. Glad for some discussion.
However, you know the credit card companies feed off the suckers. It's truly a sucker's game.
I used them for business and had some personal cards get out of control. Today I have none and I like it that way.

susanr Colorado
03/09/13 5:53 pm

No offense, Ray, no worries. The credit card creeps that have bothered me the most were those preying on new college students. Lots of them, offering shiny things to anyone who would sign up. Kids who'd maybe never been away from home before. Vultures. Also those who prey on people already in debt.

RayX quit
03/09/13 5:59 pm

I charged about $120,000 on an American Express card to pay for hotel rooms for customers just 10 years ago. I probably had another $30,000 in credit card debt. I settled all that debt but only after getting screwed with a lot of fees.

RayX quit
03/09/13 6:16 pm

My point is that the banks are sticking it to all of us.
Most people don't even know their fees.

PuppyLvr In love with Listgarten
03/09/13 1:16 pm

It would hurt the economy because businesses who rely on using credit cards would lose customers.

onyz Somewhere in the USA
03/09/13 1:06 pm

Say goodbye to Amazon.

Reply
mjohn620
03/09/13 3:34 pm

How so? You can walk into lots of retailers and pay cash for Amazon gift cards.

rlands
03/09/13 12:22 pm

They'd have to have huge bills.

"I need change for my $1,000,000 bill please"

Reply
Libertarian2016 Texas
03/09/13 12:45 pm

How rich are you?!

FIAT2LUX On Planet Earth
03/09/13 12:59 pm

You should look up the history of US paper currency. Back in the day, huge (drawing a blank on the word right now that describes the unit of money per bill) were indeed on bills. If any remain, they are collectibles now…

FIAT2LUX On Planet Earth
03/09/13 1:00 pm

Of course, that $200 George W. Bush bill some con man gave a cashier back in the early 2000s was still phony. ????????

rlands
03/09/13 1:01 pm

It's pretty incredible. I just wouldn't feel safe walking around with anything larger than a $20.

TheMadScientist the mad laboratory
03/09/13 3:14 pm

I once had to hand deliver an instrument valid to bearer. It was for 32 million dollars. It was not secured In anything but an envelop. It didn't occur to me until weeks after that I could have just left the country with it.

FIAT2LUX On Planet Earth
03/09/13 12:04 pm

As in no credit? Sure! As in paper cash only? No.

Reply