Do you think that expert bite mark testimony is good or junk science?
That’s how they finally sent Ted Bundy to the electric chair. After denying his guilt, he admitted it just before being executed
I think it's good. They use dental records to identify soldiers' bodies sometimes. If they can match one set of teeth to one soldier then it sounds valid to me.
Probably better than body language or polygraphs, though not by much.
It's not about what I think. It has been shown to be junk.
Texas Forensic Science Commission took a big step in junking a form of junk science, by recommending a moratorium on bite-mark evidence, one form of forensic evidence that had been touted as scientifically conclusive but has proven otherwise.