A woman has claimed the First Amendment gives her the right to spank her child to the point of injury. Valid reasoning?
What a moron.
She’s delusional about being a proper parent and about the constitution
Spanking typically does not injure a child. If it does, that's calling child abuse spanking.
Yes, you are right. You can spank a child and not harm them. Sometimes you need to get their attention, for their own good.
To the point of injury? No.
Where's the connection to the first amendment?
Freedom of religion.
Common criminal laws should, and do, trump religious convictions and rules. You can believe what you want but not act like you want.
That should be common sense but sadly isn’t the case.
She's a special kind of stupid.