Show of HandsShow of Hands

mtdewbob November 15th, 2017 11:05am

First reported in The New York Times Russians assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013. Times article shows Canadian records that Russian donations made its way to the Clinton Foundation totaling $2.35 million.

19 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

DarthWrath Mustafar
11/15/17 8:41 am

Oooo, you guys are going to love this! Straight from Fox News:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=RnsAZzsdI1U&feature=youtu.be

Reply
mtdewbob Arizona
11/15/17 10:34 am

Donations from Russia to the Clinton foundation grew from $2.3 million to over $140 million by 2016. When is the last time you known of the Russians of donating anything to any charitable organization within the United States? Is this just a coincidence, I think not. Did the Grinch’s Russian heart melt and grow three times larger overnight, I think not. The state department’s Hillary Clinton had much influence between the years 2009 and 2012. Deals were done with a simple phone call, email or text. Are we going to let criminal acts go unpunished because of who people are? If an executive of a corporation was the do half of the dirty corrupt things Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton have done in the past they be serving 20 to 30 years in prison.

DarthWrath Mustafar
11/15/17 4:02 pm

You are making a lot of assumptions. I think and it is my opinion (just like you are entitled to yours) that you are pissed that this came from Fox News! Oh well 🤷‍♂️. 😂

mtdewbob Arizona
11/15/17 5:58 pm

Go back to the 1980s Whitewater accumulate everything that’s happened since then with Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton and then tell me that all this is nothing more than assumptions. Either you have no common sense or your dances a rock.

DarthWrath Mustafar
11/15/17 9:11 pm

Sure there was shit that happened in the 80’s why are you trying to link crap that happened back then to now? What Shepard Smith is pointing out has nothing to do with the 80’s. This is a fake news story spun by Brit Bart as a stupid distraction from Muler is doing thats all. And dum fucks such as your self buy into it to help the distraction.
Again you’re pissed that Fox News actually did some good investigative reporting on the uranium story and Shepard debunked it!😂
Oh wait, is that a tear I hear? 😥
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

Jazzy5 USA
11/15/17 6:38 am

All true——-no investigation???

Reply
mtdewbob Arizona
11/15/17 5:59 pm

I cannot understand what the holdup is in investigating a possible crime.

Jazzy5 USA
11/16/17 5:16 am

It is accepted policy that the present administration does not investigate the past administration. I heard this on TV by Judge Napolitano.
The Clinton’s did not expect to lose, now, they have backup of PC in Washington
This is Triple standard
Clinton’s
Democrats
conservatives

mtdewbob Arizona
11/16/17 5:20 am

Did you get your information from Judge Judy? Otherwise provide the Justice Department documentation that outlines your claim. It’s easy enough to find any information about the federal government and how it operates, the World Wide Web and a search engine is a good starting point. I’m sure you’ll be able to find it most rapidly. 🙄

HammeringMan Gods Away On Business
11/15/17 6:32 am

The sale and the contributions are well known out the time it occurred. The press chose not to highlight the activity. But the report can be found.

Reply
mtdewbob Arizona
11/15/17 4:27 am

I would like to hear from our Democrat friends who dispute these articles from the New York Times. The New York Times is the Liberal Bible, Liberals believe in the New York Times as truth. How can we truthful a journalistic newspaper to speak of such what Liberals believe to be falsities? If you’re Liberal or even Democrats please explain.

jrpacman Pensum iocus est
11/15/17 5:21 am

And here I was thinking you wouldn't provide a link. Wow!!

mtdewbob Arizona
11/15/17 6:03 pm

Thanks, just forgot to place it on the main page