susanr Colorado
11/06/17 5:28 pm
No. First, even if it looks slimy to settle rather than go to court, settling is simply not an admission of guilt. There are other reasons for not going through litigation (see Ebola1's comment below).
Second, it would invite *many* false claims by people wanting to get a politician removed from office, probably in an organized manner. We really mustn't open an *automatic* door for that process.
Ebola1 Florida
11/06/17 5:32 am
Good question about which I am ambivalent. It sounds good but I’m not sure it’s fair when no determination of guilt has been shown. Many medical malpractice cases are settled, not because of any wrongdoing, but because it would cost more to litigate than to settle.
Comments: Add Comment