If Kim Jong-un receives more negative media coverage than Angela Merkel, is this because of media bias or is he objectively worse?
Merkel didn't hunt down her brother and have him die such a horrible death. She not threatening to nuke people left and right like this little turd. He's a little psycopath
It's because they just don't REALLY understand his plan, and they're biased against his hairstyle.
If you think Merkel is worse than a dictator who threatens to nuke the US, pick your mind up at the lost-and-found --- if you can find it.
He is worse but it also contains bias
Guy ... failed! Both Mr Kim and Mr Trump are hated by the leftist media. Wake up!
Same deal for 45. He's objectively worse (than Merkel, not the Korean dude).
Zod ... because he woman who destroyed Germany is better than the president who is rebuilding the US after the Obama debacle. Right ...
Get over yourself, quickly
LJ ... go easy on Zod.
Germany seems pretty un-destroyed.
Mystic ... Jose women raped by Muslim invaders are an acceptable cost for globalism, right?
... those women ...
Not destroyed, also muslims are less likely to rape than native citizens
Ive been assured that objectivity in media requires reporting just as much positive about one person as you would report about anyone else.
By who? Is this going to be a difficult guess?
This appears to be the prevailing wisdom of SOH.
That doesn't surprise me. I thought it was from an individual user.
It's not media bias. Kim Jong-un is worse:
Clearly fake news.