Is the level of activity on your polls declining?
I think my last poll was over a month ago. Before that they weren't
It did a long time ago and I stopped polling. No fun if people are not interested.
I think so.
What polls 😅
I do very few polls and I'm lucky if I get 8 people to answer 😘
Wth? Was supposed to be on top
Two years ago I'd expect a sharp comment to receive 15-25 likes. I haven't seen that in a long time on anyone's comment
Nope my poll from yesterday maxed out. Still getting roughly the same
Not really. I usually get around 100-150 votes for regular polls and 50-100 for pic polls.
I don't think so, but I don't usually pay attention to that often. As far as I can tell, it's remained more or less constant for a while.
Huge decline. HUGE decline.
Quit being so controversial EB. 😂😂😂
No, if anything I notice that it is increasing.
Not really. Some polls I get around 150 and some I get 50.
Yes, I wish I got more action. I liked the days when I got 300-400 votes; it was cool to look at the data.
To be fair, you might have scared some people away with your tagline.
Idk, I've had it for forever. I was getting those votes with the tag line. 🤔💩
Yes, but I have so many people on ignore that I expect it. I will say this: back before individual users could post polls, I once got over 1,000 likes on a single comment in a poll about California requiring insurance companies to cover artificial insemination for gays. It used to be much more common for polls to have many hundreds or even a few thousand comments.
How many people do you have on ignore? Pretty soon, you might ignore me!
Is there a way to know? Many dozens i'm sure.
Too many to count! I thought you enjoyed arguing.
I used to argue, but I'm very content these days to state my opinion and move on. I'll interact with a dissenter, but not in a protracted debate. If he gets ugly, stupid, or I just don't want to hear from him anymore, then I'll ignore him.
I still remembered that poll about gay adoption where you debated people for hours about whether or not homosexuality was natural.
You were around back then? That was around 5 years ago.
We might be thinking about separate polls.
I don't have any appetite for people's stupidity, anymore. Arguing with people who can't tell the difference between boys and girls is futile to begin with. Somebody once said something about wrestling with pigs...............
Well, I made those arguments about homosexuality countless times.
So I would expect for your polls to have less activity than before because people will naturally get tired of arguing without some benefit from it. The people who used to engage you have learned that they're not going to change your mind and so "bickering" about the same issues one more time becomes less appealing.
Well, I used to create polls from major headlines. I have grown tired of the repeated news headlines dealing with Trump and Russia. That's why you don't see many polls from me related to politics. It's so tedious to listen to the news.
This user is currently being ignored.
Okie became a snowflake? ❄️
Just kidding, you did argue about homosexuality a lot from what I remember.
Lately, most of polls have been targeted to Christians, and we have had some good discussions. Due to targeting, I will have less votes and sometimes less comments.
In general, I do not get into many debates because so many people have me on ignore. Therefore, from my perspective, there isn't as much activity in general.
I have no idea. I create a poll so rarely that I've not noticed.
Inline with the trajectory of the app as a whole.
I must say that the quality have the questions have improved. About a year ago, the only polls that SOH would ask were non-controversial ones.
I remembered the days when "OBAMA = FAILURE" would generate 100+ likes.
Ah yes the good ole Tony days. How far this app has fallen...
Political is a dead account so that makes sense.
Isn't it against your religion to criticize other white people?
I don't usually criticize smart White Nationalists; you are correct. How do you fit with that in any way?
Oh! Excuse me, I don't fit into either category.
Not smart and not Pro-White? How honest of you.
My moral compass is God's word, and there is nothing in scripture that suggests that God's children are judged by the color of their skins.
I'm interested though. What is your moral compass?
My moral compass is in acting to preserve a future and homeland for White children and to protect the Western history my European ancestors fought and died for.
I'm sympathetic to preserving a culture, but I hope your mindset does not consist of white supremacy.
And what is White supremacy?
Believing Whites deserve their own territory just like every other race has? Is that "supremacy"?
Understanding that Whites on average have significantly higher IQ, lower illegitimately rates, and lower crime rates when compared to Blacks? Is that "Supremacy"?
Your petty labels mean nothing to more and more Whites to are waking up to their mass displacement by the 3rd world. It will be reversed.
If you think an individual is better based upon his/her skin color, that is white supremacy.
Do you believe the Nazis were right about Dawin's evolution amongst people?
Genetics due to geographic separation unquestionably creates different societal outcomes. Recognizing racial trends and wanting to be with your own people is natural and healthy.
Please answer my last question when you get a chance.