Show of HandsShow of Hands

thatguy2 May 22nd, 2017 4:37pm

The AP is reporting that Michael Flynn will invoke the 5th Amendment and refuse to comply with a Senate subpoena for documents related to the Russia investigation. If this happens, does it add legitimacy to the investigation or nah?

11 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

ladyniner81 no hope for humanity
05/24/17 4:37 am

Aren't you in held in contempt of court if you refuse a subpoena ? Or is that just for the regular folk?

Reply
xtarite
05/22/17 12:18 pm

So when Flynn does it it's breaking the constitution but when Sally Yates does it it's all ok?? Hypocritical snakes

Reply
thatguy2 We tried to warn you
05/22/17 12:20 pm

What were you told that Yates did?

commonsense America isnt racist
05/22/17 12:15 pm

I love it. It's going to drive democrats nuts.

Reply
thatguy2 We tried to warn you
05/22/17 12:19 pm

That does appear to be the driving force behind Republicans supporters these days, whatever might upset Democrats. It's all just a game. Country be damned.

Think Lovin Life
05/22/17 11:10 am

Guy ... you mean he might actually do what the parade of corrupt Democrats did for the past eight years? Where were you and your newfound outage back then?

Reply
thatguy2 We tried to warn you
05/22/17 11:16 am

It's amusing that you always assume you know how I felt about situations from years past. It's equally amusing that you think that it has any relevance to this matter. I know this is a lot to ask of you, but how about you answer the question without referring to me, Hillary, or the Obama Admin?

DounutHole
05/22/17 11:23 am

That would be impossible for Rethink, of the magical Mormon believe system.

WorstGooEver Nuke the Hurricanes
05/22/17 2:07 pm

Think never talks about the issues at hand. It's always "blah blah blah the democrats!"

Jazzy5 USA
05/22/17 10:55 am

What lawyer, would allow his client to testify! W/O Immunity...

Reply
thatguy2 We tried to warn you
05/22/17 11:01 am

A lawyer without a guilty client.

Jazzy5 USA
05/22/17 11:04 am

This is congress, not a jury!
Otherwise I agree!

OhTheIrony Learning from you
05/22/17 10:44 am

I just want this guy in jail.

Reply
Jazzy5 USA
05/22/17 10:53 am

Lois Lerner took the fifth, she used the IRS. Never went to jail, walked with a pension.

OhTheIrony Learning from you
05/22/17 10:57 am

So...what does that have to do with Michael Flynn?

Jazzy5 USA
05/22/17 11:04 am

It means that anyone can take it! Even you!

OhTheIrony Learning from you
05/22/17 11:06 am

Yes, I don't have a problem with the 5th amendment. I think it's fantastic. I have a problem with Mr. Flynn, who is almost definitely guilty of treason.

Jazzy5 USA
05/22/17 11:19 am

Well, let me say this. Feelings in a court of law, don't matter. The facts do..
If Congress, asking questions was a useful and productive process, we would get answers. It is not. If Flynn, has broken the law, then congress should produce the facts.. All we have are leaks.... When it is Comey's turn, don't expect much..
Dog and pony show..

thatguy2 We tried to warn you
05/22/17 1:11 pm

You realize the purpose of subpoenas are to get the facts straight, right? It's clear Flynn would rather we not know the facts.

Jazzy5 USA
05/22/17 1:16 pm

How many people have been subpoenaed? What do you walk away with? We have been here a million times! This would not be my first rodeo, watching this...government is what government wants...

LibArtie SW Connecticut
05/22/17 9:54 am

All investigations have always been legitimate. You can't make water wetter by adding water to it.

Reply
EarlyBird Portland
05/22/17 9:43 am

Only a fool would think it doesn't.

Reply
Squidboy Snarkapottamus
05/22/17 9:40 am

If you've done nothing wrong....you have nothing to hide...or obstruct.

Reply