Should the U.S constitution be interpreted by original intent (strictly off constitution) or judicial activism inferences read between the lines for Supreme Court rulings
If we read the constitution as it was 'with original intent', black people would still be 3/5ths of a person.
That was amended!
Supreme Court reading bt the lines is straight BS and overreach of the court's powers. Laws are written with intent, not 'whatever I feel this means'. Don't like the law? Legislate.