05/15/17 3:29 pm
HR McMaster the only person who was named in the article said, "“At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”
Read more than the headlines. Unnamed sources are not credible. This article was a great alexample of why people quit paying attention to the media.
RussianThunder Russia and USA
05/15/17 3:16 pm
I love how the US officials are never named.
It's the post. If they didn't keep droning on about it I might take it more seriously. As it is, I feel like if Trump personally rescued an overturned car in a flood plane with 5 people and a dog inside it, rescuing all of the people but could not save the dog....the headlines in the Post and MSNBC would be "Trump murders puppy"
I don't like him and wish he was not elected. However, the constant bashing needs to stop because many people have stopped listening, realizing the media is biased. Hannity would like Trumps shoes and Matthews had a wif of a coup. Both sides are ridiculous.
PamGH SW Washington
05/15/17 3:04 pm
The information Trump relayed had been provided by a U.S. partner through an intelligence-sharing arrangement considered so sensitive that details have been withheld from allies and tightly restricted even within the U.S. government, officials said. Ok I don't like him as most of you know, but this the first time I've said this: He is dangerous, not very bright, a threat to democracy and he has got to go.
Comments: Add Comment