President Trump revealed highly sensitive classified intel directly to the Russians last week. For almost anyone in government this would be illegal. POTUS has broad authority to declassify government secrets. Was this a gaffe OR part of a plan?
Trump's mouth is one dig gaffed.
It is a continuation of the false narrative constructed by the Avenge the Clintons group. Propaganda. Click on this headline if you love the Clintons and hate Trump.
Yeah because Hillary brought the Russians into the Oval Office. She's devious. A puppet master.
You better watch it. She'll put a hit on you. She's crazy.
Crazy like Al Capone.
It's just that there is absolutely no proof of the Washington Post's allegations. This is more fake news.
Just like your believe in magical Mormon underwear!
Hole ... you're a bigot.
Your culture believes in polygamy.
Hole ... are you Islamaphobic? Are you suggesting that all alternate forms of love are wrong? What precisely are you suggesting?
Rethink, so you beat your wife's?
Mormon magical underwear 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Part of the plan. Sadly, a Russian plan, but still...a plan.
If true, it is quite bad. Definitely NOT strategy.
Trying to act like a big shot.
Doesn't have to act. He is the biggest shot on the planet
Silly auto cucumber, replacing the 'i' with an 'o'.
Tillerson and McMaster both denied the story
So anything negative that is reported on trump is fake news?
Did I say that?
I said that both McMaster and Tillerson called it fake news.
To early to tell in this case.
Maybe if the WaPo had not done such a blatantly biased of negatively covering Trump for the last 10 months, i might take their story seriously.
Unlike the blind hatred of all things Trump crowd, i would like more information first.
Tillerson denied things that were not claimed in the WaPo story... so not actually a denial.
Actually, same thing with the McMaster statement I believe.
McMaster said the story was false.
I did not hear Tillerson's comment
But then he went on with very specific denials that didn't match up.
After declaring the story completely false.
If someone writes a story about you stealing a car, and I say "that story is false! Malekithe did not kill anyone, did not jaywalk, and did not expose himself!", my statement can definitely be called into question. It makes it look like he has no idea what was in the article.
He didn't elaborate about the article he said was false.
He also did not elaborate on what was shared.
"At no time -- at no time -- were intelligence sources or methods discussed. And the president did not disclose any military operations that were not already publicly known. Two other senior officials who were present, including the secretary of state, remember it being the same way and have said so. Their on-the-record accounts should outweigh those of anonymous sources.And I was in the room. It didn't happen."
That's what he said immediately after saying the story was false, but he doesn't address the actual allegations.
If he said the story was false why would he talk about it.
If you contest the contents of a story, you address what was said in the story, bot random things that nobody mentioned.
He's not devious just stupid. He doesn't have a clue how to do his job.
Read more than the headline. The Single named source says "“At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”
The rest of the article might as well be fabricated with no credible sources.
I read the entire article. The part where DJ T gave away not only the Intel, but the city in which it was obtained. The part where he didn't give advance notice of divulging this information, putting that source personally at risk and the entire network at risk. The part where the intelligence experts were freaking out. The part where we had not shared this source with even some of our closest allies.
Seems you have a hard time identifying facts.
I prefer sources. Not a "former us intelligence official" or a "senior us official". Names imply facts. These terms imply made up or misconstrued BS.
So in your mind, Watergate never happened because Deep Throat was never identified. 😐
Gee....if only there were credible witnesses in the Oval Office to corroborate Trump's defense.....
Fine let the media lead you where they want you. You are already half way there anyways.
I am not a Trump fan but I am sick of all the allegations without named witnesses. I have no faith in the media as they have proven to be chasing ratings and pursuing agendas. Unless they are going to give an identified source, I won't deem it credible.
MSM is acting like Brietbart did for the last year with half truths and unidentifiable sources.
Last eight years that is.
I want to think it's a well-thought out, yet treasonous plan, instead of bragging about a new thing he's learned like my kindergartener telling me that he knows what 50 + 50 is.
But...has anyone ever used "well-thought out," "plan," & "Trump" in the same sentence before this one?
Trump revealed highly classified information to Russian foreign minister and ambassador - The Washington Post
Comments: Add Comment