Show of HandsShow of Hands

Comments: Add Comment

jacqueline Michigan
10/28/12 1:24 pm

Wow! To FINALLY see a discussion that hasn't resulted in name calling and instead both parties have remained calm and intelligent. I applaud you both!

Reply
palindrome California
10/28/12 12:53 pm

He's right. I said deficit instead of debt. My mistake. The debt

rastamonsta
10/28/12 10:56 am

Yeah. And also except for the part of killing bin laden, ending the war in Iraq, and killing more terrorists than any other admin. so it's Bush foreign policy except not really.


10/28/12 8:39 am

Really? Its George Bush's policy, well except for the part where you put ambassadors in harms way and then not protect them. You can't show force in a new islamic democracy you know....

rastamonsta
10/28/12 8:37 am

Last comment before I go, you're right filibuster is always an issue for presidents. But Obama was filibustered over 60 times. More than any other pres. Thats a lot of slaps in the face haha

BrandonE
10/28/12 8:34 am

quite scary if he's going to be "more aggressive".The filibuster is something that is dealt with in DC no matter who is in office. If speaking about not moving forward,Harry Reid won't even bring a budget to the floor of the senate...is this regard for America,or partisan politics? That's rhetorical

Reply
rastamonsta
10/28/12 8:33 am

Hey I have to go. But would live to continue this discussion later. "I'll be back" haha

BrandonE
10/28/12 8:31 am

To borrow a line from Monday night football, " C'Mon man!"...he's been in Washington long enough to understand how aggressive he has to be. Unfortunately, times we've seen Obama be "aggressive, it has been coupled with those closed door deals & very partisan politics;

Reply
rastamonsta
10/28/12 8:27 am

Don't criticize Obamas foreign policy because according to the third debate, it's Romneys policy as well.

rastamonsta
10/28/12 8:25 am

But the leadership wasn't immaculate as governor. Much like its not for Obama. I think it can go both ways.

rastamonsta
10/28/12 8:24 am

Haha(the palin comment) I think we all thought that. But I believe as governor Romney also brought Mass. from 36th(already pretty bad) to 47th in job productivity, left a billion dollar debt, and outsourced many jobs. Along with tax cuts for the rich. Now business wise, he is successful no doubt

rastamonsta
10/28/12 8:21 am

While they did have the majority in both the house and senate, filibustering was an issue. As it was throughout his presidency. Could he have done more? Possibly. But there goes that experience or lack there of we were discussing. He knows he has to be more aggressive this time around

BrandonE
10/28/12 8:17 am

I def agree with you on the McCain thing. The moment Palin walked out on that stage I looked at my wife & said "well there goes that!"

BrandonE
10/28/12 8:15 am

But he has! Balanced budgets in all 4 years as governor, surplus, working with the other side, etc. Obama has been in his First position to show us leadership, and he hasn't. He has shown nothing but partisan politics, closed door deals, & now this stuff in Libya...it's getting worse, not better

Reply
rastamonsta
10/28/12 8:11 am

There was no justification. I wasn't a big Obama fan 4 yrs ago. He's a nice guy but I agree that his inexperience was unsettling. And McCain would've been the obvious choice with a different vp by his side. I think having palin hurt him more than it helped.

BrandonE
10/28/12 8:09 am

You have to remember that Obama had a majority in both the house & senate for the first two years of his presidency. Ask yourself, if you were in the house & the sitting president had approached the issues in the ways that this one has, would you be more or less willing to work with him?

Reply
BrandonE
10/28/12 8:05 am

To your comment: No, running a biz is not the same as running a country; however, I would argue that it does give one more qualification than a freshman senator/community organizer/professor. Based on ur comment, what would have been your justification for Obama 4 years ago?

Reply
rastamonsta
10/28/12 8:03 am

Model for our country. So I ask myself the same question. Does he have something up his sleeve. I think what Obama has going for him this time around is the fact congress will work with him

rastamonsta
10/28/12 8:02 am

Well you have to remember that congress was not being very bipartisan. But you're right there is no promise it will be better, but how is it different in Romney's case. He's never been in a position to show us his "leadership" other than governor. And to be honest, you can't say that's a very good

BrandonE
10/28/12 8:00 am

Frankly, based on what I've experienced over the last 4 years, I'm not willing to take the gamble...not for my kids future, not for me, not for my business, not for America.

Reply
BrandonE
10/28/12 7:58 am

What promise do I have that the next 4 years won't be more of the same, or even worse? You know, maybe the guys got something up his sleeve that no one knows about that will turn everything around & make everything better.

BrandonE
10/28/12 7:54 am

Under this president I have experienced only increased costs, fewer customers (as I deal with small businesses that have had to cut back costs) an almost $2000 increase in healthcare costs,all with continued fruitless spending & not one budget coming from the white house that even a dem will support

rastamonsta
10/28/12 7:53 am

You seem like one of the more reasonable Romney supporters on this app. I'll be honest with you, people portray Romney as this great leader but I haven't seen that yet. Not saying he's not, but running a business is not the same as running a country.

BrandonE
10/28/12 7:47 am

policies has left a very sour taste in my mouth. If this guy was Clinton, I'd probably be voting for him, but in a race where a Carteresk candidate is running, I simply can not justify this president.

BrandonE
10/28/12 7:44 am

Sure, I appreciate his continuing of going after those that would do us harm & his desire to make healthcare available/affordable to everyone. Unfortunately, speaking to the latter, I wish I could say I appreciate his "accomplishment" in that area, however, his approach on this, and many other

Reply
rastamonsta
10/28/12 7:39 am

Alright Brandon lets discuss it. I like a good discussion as long as youre not going to be completely biased. So of course Obama has added to our debt. We know that. Do you have anything good to say?(no sarcastic undertone, it's a serious question)

BrandonE
10/28/12 7:36 am

Let's talk about recent history indeed...like the last 4 years...

rastamonsta
10/28/12 7:35 am

Ok. So what's your excuse for reagan tripling the deficit?


10/28/12 7:33 am

If Romney had no foreign policy experience what the hell did Obama have? He adopted most of Bush's policies and kept most of Bush's people. The outsourcing comment says you have nothing else. Admit it Obummer has been a bummer its ok to vote for a fixer with proven success!

rastamonsta
10/28/12 7:29 am

And no one is using Reagan as a scapegoat. We are simply responding to a comment made about how republicans have dug us out of a hole, so to speak, in the past. But in recent history they've only worsened our condition for the most part.

rastamonsta
10/28/12 7:26 am

Brandon: whether you like it or not, Reagan was not one of the great presidents. Nice guy? Of course! But that can't taint your vision and blind you to the fact he raised taxes over 5 times and tripled our debt. Among other things

rastamonsta
10/28/12 7:23 am

Q ballart: I stated that Obama added to the deficit. So I'm not in denial. My point is that if Romney needs 8yrs to balance the budget, Obama should be allowed a second term.

BrandonE
10/28/12 5:56 am

Not if his policies were as failed as Obama's.

Reply
BrandonE
10/28/12 5:53 am

Funny how you're still talking about Reagan (who btw is/will be going down in history as one of the greats, whether you like it or not) instead of your failed president.

Lib response: talk about anyone BUT my guy...if must talk about my guy, immediately begin blame game

Reply
Qballart New York
10/28/12 5:34 am

Obama added to the debt, please try to understand economics before you quote pundit quotes. It will help bring validity to your point.

Reply
Qballart New York
10/28/12 5:30 am

Nope a true flip flipper like Obama can't be trusted.

Qballart New York
10/28/12 5:22 am

Fight the real war on women, in the Middle East.

Qballart New York
10/28/12 5:15 am

The deficit is the yearly shortfall, the debt is the running total. You can't pay down the deficit only balance the budget and therefore have no deficit.

It's ok John Stewart didn't understand it either, Bill O'rielly had to explain it to him too.

Reply
anonymousone Georgia
10/27/12 11:29 pm

We need to cut through the noise. Certain points get repeated over and over and over again. What happens is we get a lopsided view of the facts, due to the weight partisans on either side give to them.

Reply
rastamonsta
10/27/12 10:02 pm

And Romney will be just as much of a "rookie". He's never been in a position to act upon foreign policy. What makes you think he will be any better? No foreign policy experience as governor(unless you're counting the outsourced jobs). It goes both ways in that case.

USA1st
10/27/12 9:15 pm

oops typo, I obviously meant South Africa.


10/27/12 7:32 pm

Now we find he can't even keep our own people safe or at least isn't willing to send help when he could have very easily. Just proves what a rookie he really is...

Reply

10/27/12 7:31 pm

I read an article last week saying the International Court in the Hague is going to indict Obama for his numerous activities with drones. I wonder if The Nobel Committee will want their Peace prize back? He kept so many of Bush's policies it make you wonder.

rastamonsta
10/27/12 7:04 pm

Oh and a terrible actor.
Just kidding

rastamonsta
10/27/12 7:02 pm

Lmao.
Exactly right. It's such a double standard.

palindrome California
10/27/12 6:59 pm

He was an intl. war criminal, funded terrorists, armed Iran, exploded our national debt, raised taxes, granted massive amnesty to illegals, argued for separation of church and state....

Republican response: but OBAMA!!!! Rawrrrrrr!!!!

Reply
rastamonsta
10/27/12 6:55 pm

To fix our economy(not judging you) but be honest with yourself; how can you be sure he wont flip flop on some issues that are important to YOU. Decide he wants to cut loopholes that affect YOU. It's a risky deal.

rastamonsta
10/27/12 6:53 pm

You're right ibethann. I agree everyone deserves a chance. So why doesn't Obama? Like I said before, Romney says he needs 8 yrs to balance the budget, but why does Obama only get 4? And this time around congress will work with him, not against. And maybe Romney's plan sounds good to you as a model

rastamonsta
10/27/12 6:48 pm

Thank you palindrome. Republicans have Reagan on this pedestal but forget that he raised taxes over 5 times as president. He wasn't the political "saint" they make him out to be. How easy they forget.

Reply
palindrome California
10/27/12 6:41 pm

Ibbethann- "we should give the republicans a chance... republicans have dug us out of these holes before"

-- actually, they haven't ever done that in recent history. They've doubled our deficit AT THE VERY LEAST. Reagan tripled it. Democrats have actually come the closest to paying our deficit down

Reply