Show of HandsShow of Hands

iceberg124 December 18th, 2016 3:01am

Should people without kids pay less school taxes than people with kids?

8 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

callen002 Cincinnati
12/18/16 5:48 pm

Let's just do away w property taxes towards schools. People w kids just pay the tuition. Property taxes can pay for police, fire protection and other city services.

Reply
Malekithe Bedrock
12/18/16 6:08 pm

πŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌ

Senate101 San Diego
12/18/16 4:44 pm

No, that would increase the tax burden on parents.

madconservative President Trump
12/19/16 12:03 am

So what? Not my fault the government rewards poor people for spitting out kids they can't afford. Maybe they would reconsider having that 5th one. I don't have kids and shouldn't have to pay for other people's education.

Senate101 San Diego
12/19/16 8:33 am

Sorry, but it's your duty as a citizen to pay for other people to become functioning members of society. If you don't like it, venture to Somalia. I heard they have no taxes!

Korosensei Maine
12/18/16 10:18 am

Even if you don't have kids you are receiving benefits from there being a school so yes

Malekithe Bedrock
12/18/16 6:08 pm

What benefits are those

madconservative President Trump
12/19/16 12:04 am

Yeah what benefits? This is the dumbest statement in months. What am I getting out of a school I am not utilizing?

Korosensei Maine
12/19/16 9:49 am

To begin with you were likely educated in a public school at some point so you are paying for all that education you got as a kid. Secondly publicly funded education means that the kids most likely to not be in school and be causing trouble and decreasing property values are sitting them butts in class and learning. There are more but those are the big ones.

Malekithe Bedrock
12/19/16 10:29 am

My parents taxes paid my education. What about people who send their kids to private school?
They are paying twice.
"Secondly publicly funded education means that the kids most likely to not be in school and be causing trouble"
That is a not a compelling reason.
Parents should pay for educating their offspring.

googer11 Minnesota
12/18/16 6:24 am

Haha. Should people who hate football have to pay for a new stadium?

Reply
evoecon nearest binary system
12/17/16 10:29 pm

Redistribution of wealth takes many forms. Why should single people pay a higher income tax?

Reply
tech24073
12/17/16 9:56 pm

Someone paid for me to go to school, so it is my turn to pay for another kid's opportunity. Taxing parents alone would not fund schools. Basic education is needed for all citizens.

Reply
Okie1967 The Cage Whisperer
12/17/16 9:40 pm

Yes, and actually there shouldn't be government schools. Kids needing welfare can get a voucher, but there shouldn't ever be a government school.

Reply
Nuclear Boaty McBoatface
12/17/16 9:10 pm

No. We all benefit from an educated population

Reply
Praetorianus Fair enough.
12/17/16 9:26 pm

Yes but aren't public schools part of the public sector where the government can allocate a budget from whatever general revenue like income or sales taxes they get? Why a special tax? Our defense is also important but we don't pay a defense tax.

Nuclear Boaty McBoatface
12/17/16 9:28 pm

Because they aren't exclusively federally funded. They're funded on a city or county level.

Nuclear Boaty McBoatface
12/17/16 9:28 pm

And specific taxes help the payer understand that their money is going directly to the schools and not elsewhere.

Praetorianus Fair enough.
12/17/16 9:31 pm

I have once favored on SoH that everyone should be allowed to allocate their income taxes so they know where their taxes go. Different priorities would even out. Oddly, almost nobody supported this.

suppressedID That is my secret Cap
12/18/16 10:07 am

Perfect explanation @Nuclear. Well done.

susanr Colorado
12/17/16 8:50 pm

No. Public education is for the benefit of *all* of our society. It's something we were committed to, to one extent or another, before we were even a country.

I've happily paid taxes for public schools before I had a child of my own in public school, for the years when my child went to a private school, and for the many years since my child graduated from public school.

It's not about *my* child. It's about all of our future citizens. We *all* have a stake in their education.

.

Reply
suppressedID That is my secret Cap
12/18/16 10:08 am

I knew Susan would phrase it eloquently.

Praetorianus Fair enough.
12/17/16 8:25 pm

How about none at all?
If you don't use something, don't be taxed.

Reply
iceberg124
12/17/16 8:58 pm

The argument can be made that you are benefitting from having kids in your neighborhood who are educated and less likely to cause crime etc. increasing your standard of living.

Praetorianus Fair enough.
12/17/16 9:11 pm

The department of education will still receive funds, and schools stay funded by families with kids.
I see it like the church taxes some countries have. You can opt out if you don't favor (organized) religion.

sweetnes34 Outta Phucks
12/18/16 6:24 am

You don't use the fire dept until you need them but you've been paying for them since whenever you've started paying taxes.

Praetorianus Fair enough.
12/18/16 4:56 pm

Invalid analogy.
A fire can happen anytime but if I want kids is my decision.