National Geographic magazine's January 2017 edition covers a transgender 9-yr-old with the subtext "Gender Revolution". Appropriate?
Personal opinions about the legitimacy of transgenderism aside, it's completely irresponsible of his parents to put him at the center of such a controversial issue.
Doesn't sound very geographic ... sounds more anthropological.
NatGeo has long covered anthropological stuff.
Liked tor not its here
It appears they're combining the transgender revolution and the pedophilia revolution into one. Was there any doubt these perverts never really had a problem with pedophilia?
The magazine that likes to publish nudes of the African continent?
Sounds like brr is projecting again...
Projecting a light on the degenerate cockroaches of the left.
Dude, there's only one kind of person whose first thought upon seeing a picture of a 9-year old is "man, they're really pandering to paedophiles here..." (Hint: it's not somebody who's trying to "shine a light.")
Doesn't work when the picture of the 9 year old just so happens to be used to introduce the tranny revolution.
So, knowing the kid is trans makes you think about paedophilia, but if the kid wasn't trans you wouldn't? I don't think this is helping your case.
I don't know any such thing, because false things can't be known. The kid isn't trans, he's been made up like a girl and made to live a delusion. One which will likely end early when he commits suicide. At which time the perverts of the left will want to use his corpse to begin the necrophilia revolution.
Child abuse......and exacerbating a mental disorder.
Id say building a mental disorder. Many little girls and boys are a bit tom boyish or feminine. You're supposed to let it run its short course, not turn it into their identity.
This user is currently being ignored
Where do you get your scientific knowledge from?
Great answer. /S
I just like to watch you fight your way out of a wet paper bag and then pat yourself on the back at how smart you are. Again, you didn't disappoint.
Says the pedophile.
I didnt follow any of this, but I still enjoyed it
It's always enjoyable when this confessed pedophile tries to spin his way out of nonsense.
I didn't take a position at all. I questioned your explanation which was disjointed.
I'm saying, nothing you said made any logical sense. How are all kids female until puberty? That's absurd.
No. Covering a mess delusion as though it is a social revolution is just sick.
*mass delusion. Come on, Siri!
Can you imagine the hate this kid would be getting if he came out as a republican?
Natgeo has been going down hill for a long time. Wish they would focus more on science stuff and less on liberal agendas.
Nobody ever opened one of those except to see aboriginal and African breasts.
Lol. Just like nobody opens a playboy just to read the articles.