She did not have the people that wanted jobs, good affordable health care, a government of the middle class. The sexist, wage gap, racist, usual DEM arguments did not fly.
They showed the vast majority of his rallies in full and never took him seriously, up until election night. This pissed off Trump voters. Hilary has other reasons to be embarrassed, this isn't one of them.
Think, the context of this thread is the media, therefore THEY is acceptable. Few people took Trump seriously because he has no experience in government and said crazy shit.
And yeah, the media also spent a long time talking about how Hitler didn't know what he was doing, and even though people elected him they'd totally regret it soon when they found out he didn't have any plans, then the holocaust happened
Mystic ... except when it's not ... like the first fascists every identified. Did you forget that Mussolini was a communist and Hitler was a social democrat?
Don't you hate it when your common core trained leftist activist teachers lied to you? Reality is not dependent on your misunderstandings.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
"Fascism opposes liberalism, marxism, and anarchism"
Plus communists were in the concentration camps, along with gay people. Hitler was extremely socially and economically conservative
Mystic ... nonsense! Fascism is a form of authoritarianism that knows no limit based on political ideology.
By the way, you ignored the fact that Hitler was a social democrat and Mussolini was a communist. I understand that you can't acknowledge these facts and maintain your lie.
Mystic ... noted that you won't answer the questions. The fact is that the media coverage of Mr Trump is in no way similar to the coverage given to Mr Hitler. One was overwhelming negative and the other was dishonestly positive.
In fact, if you're looking for a parallel, the fawning coverage of Mrs Clinton is FAR more parallel to Mr Hitler than anything!
Mystic ... of course you'd use your vague musings to abstract fiction. Explain the difference between the German media coverage of Mr Hitler to the US media coverage of Mrs Clinton.
"but he was clear to point out that his interpretation of socialism "has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism," saying that "Marxism is anti-property; true Socialism is not."
I'm comparing the American coverage if trump to the American coverage of hitler, because I don't like to compare apples to oranges, and Hillary doesn't censor the media
"Hitler also believed that individuals within a nation battled with each other for survival, and that such ruthless competition was good for the health of the nation, because it promoted "superior individuals" to higher positions in society."
"Hitler also expressed his belief in "the further development of humanity through the promotion of private initiative, in which alone I see the precondition for all real progress"
Neither. I actually know what I'm talking about instead of throwing on an antiquated label and calling it good. Besides, you haven't exactly provided any support
Comments: Add Comment