Practically speaking, obviously not. You just have to look around the world a little. Or even look at how America values the lives of different people. Ideally all lives would be worth the same, but we're far from being in an ideal world.
It is all relative. Worth more to whom? To me, my husband and kids' lives are more important than anyone else. To Catholics it is the Pope perhaps. To our country it might be Obama. Etc.
In a relativist sense, yes. That is, the lives of some people have more value to each of us than others. In a real sense, each is just one of over seven billion, hardly scarce enough to have any value at all.
I'd say yes because I would take a bullet for the President (even Obama) and for my family but not for many other people. So in my view, yes, but thats not necessarily a bad thing.
A human is a human is a human. However, some are politically more valuable, some are biologically more valuable (a kid with many years of life remaining versus an elderly person with a few years remaining), and so forth. So I'm not really sure…
That is essentially the message in war, in the death penalty, etc. And I believe it. If I had to shoot someone so they didn't kill, say, a child, I would - and I wouldn't hesitate.
If you are a police sniper and someone is about to kill a hostage, there are 2 choices. A: Do nothing and end up with a dead hostage and an executed murderer, or B: Kill the guy attempting murder and only have 1 death instead of 2.
Pipes. Religion has nothing to do with it, It's all human morals.
Especially from the example she gave.
If I saw Adam Lanza at 2 yrs old and I knew he would commit the ungodly hell he did 7 months ago.. I would shoot him faster than I could breathe
Comments: Add Comment