Show of HandsShow of Hands


Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
rebelfury76 June 30th, 2013 8:22am

Is the blurring of the line between civilian police forces and national military forces troubling?

Yes No
14 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

kilokalex Sanity is for the weak
06/30/13 1:39 pm

Y'all are forgetting driving is not a right.

Reply
rebelfury76
07/01/13 12:37 am

Freedom of movement is

leary Dulag Luft
06/30/13 11:31 am

The blurring of the line between freedom and tyranny is a concern.

Reply
skinner Jersey City
06/30/13 11:21 am

Yes in fact it's terrifying

Reply
rebelfury76
07/01/13 12:37 am

Holy dog shît we agree on something

aurealis the sky
06/30/13 10:37 am

Yes. I don't trust them.

Reply
Fjolsvin Midgard
06/30/13 9:55 am

For those who forget history, it has been very common to use military force against we the people. Washington himself did it in shays rebellion. Jackson, Lincoln, Ike, lbj, if you dig hard enough you will find almost every president has. Legal or not

Reply
Diogenes Not Biden It
06/30/13 5:50 am

Check out what the cops are doing to DUI suspects who refuse the field sobriety test in a county in GA. www.myfoxatlanta.com/story/22706519/georgia-counties-seizing-dui-suspects-blood

Reply
kilokalex Sanity is for the weak
06/30/13 6:41 am

I'm for he blood draw but that's excessive force hold down a compliant individual. I'm all for DUI and dwi being felonies and refusal to take a breathalyzer test to be permanent loss of drivers license. Americans have no personal responsibility.

Fjolsvin Midgard
06/30/13 9:52 am

You do know that the breath test is a "black box". It has been ruled in court that its operation is a trade secret. This means we the people are not allowed to know how it works or frankly if it works. Just move along citizen and don't ask questions

kilokalex Sanity is for the weak
06/30/13 10:44 am

What's wrong then with saying I will not blow on that however I willing give my consent to a blood test. Your still not refusing a test.

Diogenes Not Biden It
06/30/13 11:30 am

Exactly. But even if you give consent for the blood draw, it requires 6 officers to strap you down and one of them to force your head down with his forearm, even if you're female.

kilokalex Sanity is for the weak
06/30/13 1:13 pm

Already said that's excessive force.

Diogenes Not Biden It
06/30/13 4:29 pm

I understand. I have posted roughly the same poll asking my followers if they felt this method unreasonable. Most still think its ok to strap down those who've already consented to the blood draw. Pathetic.

kilokalex Sanity is for the weak
06/30/13 6:56 pm

I worked in a prison not a jail and cause its state not county we had many more restrictions. The restraint chair used in jail cannot be used in prison because it is cruel.

Diogenes Not Biden It
06/30/13 5:49 am

Yes, but that was one campaign promise Obama is making good on. His civilian police force just as strong as our military is now reality. The martial law procedure over roughly 100 square miles in Massachusetts to capture one person was an outrage.

Reply
skschroen always at school
06/30/13 5:13 am

I didnt think there was a blurring line with that....

Reply
rebelfury76
06/30/13 5:16 am

Google BEARCAT and images from the days following the Boston bomb.

Then google images from the Baghdad invasion.

Liberty 4,032,064
06/30/13 4:09 am

It's a bypass of the third amendment.

It's very troubling, especially when you consider what happened in Boston.

Reply
rebelfury76
06/30/13 5:16 am

Yup

pinkyusuck The Carribean. I wish.
06/30/13 2:01 am

Aw, look at our two little blues snuggling up together.

Reply
pinkyusuck The Carribean. I wish.
06/30/13 2:00 am

Yes, the two should be very distinct and different. Both exist, ultimately, as armed checks and counterbalances against abuses of power by either.

Reply