Show of HandsShow of Hands

lovesquirt August 12th, 2016 1:39am

A big government spending cut needs to happen. What do you want cut?

6 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

kspells TheOtherOtherside
08/12/16 7:31 am

The CIA is a private entity with classified budget and spending. The CIA doesn't give a shit about what happens domestically. There concern is with foreign intelligence. Even if we could, we won't reduce the money to them. So pick a different answer option.

lovesquirt Hawkeyes
08/12/16 7:33 am

Ha! My intent wasn't to offend anyone.

DoctorWasdarb Marxist Leninist Maoist
08/12/16 1:47 am

DEA? I think we should abolish the CIA, NSA, and most anything aligned with the expansionary arm of the capitalist state.

Reply
shoeless Texas
08/11/16 9:35 pm

Neither. I eliminate the dept of education, dept of commerce, epa and funding for unnecessary programs.

kspells TheOtherOtherside
08/12/16 7:34 am

I'd cut the funding of congressional investigations of HRC. They seem most wasteful with useless results.

shoeless Texas
08/12/16 7:49 am

There is a lifespan for those that is limited. That's not really cutting big government on a wholesale level. And, while there hasn't been any indictment handed down for prosecution of HRC, the investigation on her email is justified IMO. When classified information is potentially involved that could put nat'l security at risk, you have to look into it. And the investigation said there was misconduct (intentional or not) on her part, just not conclusive enough to pursue prosecution. Regardless of the outcome, the investigation was necessary.

kspells TheOtherOtherside
08/12/16 12:24 pm

Everyone knew information was not being handled properly in Washington, because everyone was guilty of doing it. That's how they were able to use the false accusation against her. It was true the whole time just never criminal which everyone also knew. No investigation necessary to find out what everyone already knows. But keep telling yourself if that's what you need to believe.

shoeless Texas
08/12/16 1:03 pm

And you keep telling yourself what you want to believe as well. I didn't say others shouldn't be investigated, but that doesn't nullify the fact that her investigation was necessary.

kspells TheOtherOtherside
08/12/16 5:05 pm

We didn't find out any knew information. How is that worth the money spent? How about it gets paid back to the tax payers out of her accusers salaries? I mean if it's s necessary for Republicans to exonerate her over and over they should pay for it. Or, donate privately, but proving themselves wrong is getting expensive.