Show of HandsShow of Hands

political August 8th, 2016 8:26pm

Congresswoman Gwen Moore introduced legislation that would require wealthy taxpayers who have at least $150,000 in itemized deductions to be drug tested.

8 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

corino Utah
08/11/16 6:39 pm

Not sure how you take drugs and be competent enough to get that many deductions.

ladyniner81 extremists are a cancer
08/10/16 5:50 am

Drug tests for Congress. Maybe then that would explain why some are so batshit crazy

Reply
Captainbstring Biden is a Clown
08/09/16 5:47 pm

To what end? That's just her own sour grapes as she acts like an infantile derelict. Welfare recipients absolutely SHOULD be drug tested every 6 months. If you are on the public dole you can't take illegal drugs. We aren't paying for it!

Reply
CoffeeNow Powderpuff Leftist
08/09/16 2:18 pm

She's really taking this hating rich people thing too seriously

Reply
Liberty 4,032,064
08/09/16 5:13 am

Trolling, haha.

Reply
Mark3
08/09/16 2:50 am

Gwen Moore?
Cue the theme to On Golden Pond (the section with the loons.)

Diogenes Not Biden It
08/08/16 11:07 pm

When does congress get drug tested?

Reply
BlueLine Georgia
08/08/16 3:42 pm

I'm all for it if we start drug testing welfare recipients

Reply
PamGH SW Washington
08/08/16 3:46 pm

This is a response to that type of legislation. I think she makes a fine point. And I agree, if we drug test for government benefits then test everyone that benefits from the government, including the rich and famous. Oh and how about elected officials being subject to random drug tests too.

Carcano Matthew 10 34
08/08/16 5:13 pm

I came here to say the exact same thing.

Metamorphosis
08/08/16 7:30 pm

I agree. They are just wealthy welfare recipients.

Mark3
08/09/16 2:39 am

It's an absurd idea to think giving away money that has been forcibly taken from people is the same as allowing someone who has earned their money to keep it.

There is no logic in comparing the two.

Arya8
08/09/16 8:27 am

Agreed Mark3.

I do think drug testing congress may be at least as beneficial as drug testing welfare recipients. Though I'm not for that either, only because it's been proven to be a colossal waste of money.

corino Utah
08/11/16 6:42 pm

Egad, why don't we just drug test everyone.

Senate101 San Diego
08/08/16 3:30 pm

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA no.

Reply
TomM
08/08/16 2:53 pm

I think needs a drug test and a mental health evaluation.

Reply
TomM
08/08/16 2:59 pm

I think *Gwen

dominiclandry
08/08/16 2:04 pm

Just rewrite the tax code...

Reply
cowboy Proud Father
08/08/16 2:29 pm

Or just get rid of it altogether and have a flat tax.

dominiclandry
08/08/16 2:41 pm

That would be rewriting it

cowboy Proud Father
08/08/16 2:44 pm

There's a little more to it than just rewriting it. The IRS has to be abolished first.

rons Thanks America
08/08/16 1:57 pm

Idiots are jealous of people with money.

Reply
cowboy Proud Father
08/08/16 1:54 pm

Congress first.

Reply
susanr Colorado
08/08/16 1:45 pm

Dumb, but I believe it's being done in reaction to legislation that requires drug testing for other things, which mostly has been shown to be essentially a waste of time and money.

Reply
kscott516 Revelation 5 6
08/08/16 1:52 pm

The wealthy aren't getting taxpayer money like welfare recipients.

SupremeDolphin They.them
08/08/16 1:56 pm

Kscott, what do you think those bank bailouts were?

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
08/08/16 2:03 pm

Is the legislation only for the bankers? NO. Even if it were it would be discriminatory.

And yes, I'm against ALL bailouts due to mishandling of funds. However, the bailout money didn't go straight to their pockets but rather to the institutions. They never should've been able to give bonuses though.

susanr Colorado
08/08/16 2:03 pm

kscott - I think the analogy is that they're getting itemized deductions; the implication being (I suppose) that they don't deserve deductions if they are using the money for illegal drugs. Note that I called it dumb (not that I support drug testing for anyone who gets other government benefits, though); I'm just suggesting why it was done.

DrW - The bank bailouts didn't have anything to do with individuals' personal income tax, though, and weren't really even intended to be helpful to the corporate owners either, but to the country's economy. Only slightly similar situation, and not a good analogy.

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
08/08/16 2:28 pm

Susan, a person using their personal income to buy drugs is not equivalent to a business getting a bailout. They're not related. I see you addressed that in the 2nd part of your comment.

susanr Colorado
08/08/16 2:33 pm

Yep, exactly why I said it wasn't a good analogy.

PyroSadist like my comments follow
08/08/16 1:42 pm

That is fucking asinine. I have no problem with anybody taking all the legal deductions even if they're on a combination of heroin cocaine and meth.

And if they do pop positive so what they are taking a legal deduction.

Reply
Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 1:38 pm

This user is currently being ignored

Reply
badattitude no place like home
08/08/16 1:47 pm

I agree. As long as I don't have to pay them welfare and food stamps because they can't work.

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 1:50 pm

This user is currently being ignored

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
08/08/16 1:53 pm

His point is that if you're spending money on drugs then you can't go to the govt and complain that you don't have enough money for food and healthcare.

badattitude no place like home
08/08/16 1:54 pm

If you want to party it's your business. But if you are getting free money from me for sitting around, then you need to be looking for a job. And you're not going to pass a drug test for work. If you want to party , you can do it on your own dime. How can you be fine with that?

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 1:54 pm

This user is currently being ignored

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 1:58 pm

This user is currently being ignored

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
08/08/16 2:01 pm

WRONG!! If they're getting taxpayer money then it IS our business.

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 2:03 pm

This user is currently being ignored

badattitude no place like home
08/08/16 2:17 pm

Laser, as a business owner, do I have the right to deny a job to you if you do drugs or drink on the job?

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 2:22 pm

This user is currently being ignored

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
08/08/16 2:26 pm

Your opinion is wrong. If I'm forced to pay money towards someone's living expenses you're damn right it's my business whether they're working the system.

badattitude no place like home
08/08/16 2:27 pm

It's a little off topic but we're still talking about drug testing for benefits. But, an employer has the right to deny employment to someone based on drug use. I'm not sure how that works in Colorado, but should I have the right to deny my money to go to someone based on drug use? It's my money in both circumstances. Should I be okay with paying people to sit around and use my money to party with? I work pretty hard for my money. Shouldn't I have a say in who gets it?

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 2:30 pm

This user is currently being ignored

badattitude no place like home
08/08/16 2:30 pm

The government is taking my hard earned money at gun point. Should I just be a pansy and just agree to every use of my money that "they" deem important? Because we all know that they know better than I how my money should be spent.

badattitude no place like home
08/08/16 2:32 pm

Did you work for that money and provide a service to the community? Did the people that paid your salary get something for their hard earned money? That's not the same thing as welfare.

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 2:34 pm

This user is currently being ignored

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 2:39 pm

This user is currently being ignored

badattitude no place like home
08/08/16 2:39 pm

You're half right, the boss of the company has the right to decide if he wants to pay you to work. If he doesn't want to employ you, because you do drugs and aren't doing your job, then he can deny you more work and let you go. Same with you, but you work for the government, so maybe the rules are different since it's almost impossible to fire you.

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 2:42 pm

This user is currently being ignored

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 2:44 pm

This user is currently being ignored

badattitude no place like home
08/08/16 2:47 pm

Good debate laser. Thanks. Gotta go. See ya.

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 2:48 pm

This user is currently being ignored

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
08/08/16 4:12 pm

"I hope you understand that as a federal employee, I am technically paid with money that is collected as tax revenue. Is it your business what I do in my free time? Nope 😋"

Apples and oranges and totally unrelated. You're paid to do a job. And as long as you're doing it then there's no issue with that. But welfare is provided to people doing nothing.

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
08/08/16 4:29 pm

"When somebody patronizes your business, is the money they handed over to you still their money after the transaction is complete? Do your customers have a right to know how you spend the money that was once theirs?"

Not surprisingly this is a dumb comment. A patron willingly gives you remuneration in exchange for a product or service. NOT even close to what taxes are.

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 4:38 pm

This user is currently being ignored

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
08/08/16 7:23 pm

LOL, postal service? This isn't the 90s. I send my kids to private school so shouldn't have to fund other people's kids. Keep trying!

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 7:25 pm

This user is currently being ignored

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
08/08/16 7:35 pm

Nonexistent? Are you high? Who said that would make them nonexistent? It makes them not MY services. Follow the logic, kiddo. And if it's too difficult, just ask an adult for help. SOH needs a teen version for young, naive users like you.

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 7:37 pm

This user is currently being ignored

Laserbeam Back soon
08/08/16 7:50 pm

This user is currently being ignored

kscott516 Revelation 5 6
08/09/16 5:24 am

I pay more taxes each year than you earn before taxes are taken out. The Constitution doesn't provide for the govt to take taxes for all the things we pay taxes for now. The govt has been overreaching for more than 100 yrs.

Laserbeam Back soon
08/09/16 8:08 am

This user is currently being ignored

badattitude no place like home
08/08/16 1:34 pm

Does she want to drug test welfare and food stamp recipients too? I'm guessing that would be wrong.

Reply
political Georgia
08/08/16 1:36 pm

She believes that Paul Ryan is "Criminalizing the poor." You can't make this stuff up.

political Georgia
08/08/16 1:28 pm

This poor old lady doesn't realize the difference in someone living off of the government and someone who has earned deductions. In addition, she penalizes a specific group of people.

I'm just trying to inform you all how crazy our lawmakers are.

Reply