Show of HandsShow of Hands

suppressedID April 15th, 2016 1:40pm

Which is more dangerous, a bad conscience OR no conscience? (Inspired by the @bluefish poll on AI)

11 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

garrry Anchorite
04/16/16 6:16 pm

No concious provides limitless evil because it requires no human purpose or cause. Bad concious implies it comes from a human notion and a human limit can be applied. I believe the universal potential for evil far exceeds the natural human capacity.

Diogenes FreeMeBe
04/15/16 2:04 pm

No I'm not a sociopath, simply a type A politician.

Reply
lcamino Florida and Georgia
04/15/16 1:15 pm

I have to go to court Monday to enforce my divorcee agreement. In thinking about it, I realized he has no conscience.

TiltonAllStarz Outside Ur Comfort Zone
04/15/16 8:34 am

Ignorance of right v wrong is dangerous on a level that is indescribable.

(Adults obviously)

Reply
Wino I need a drink
04/15/16 11:41 am

But sometimes it's out of willful ignorance. In that case, yes. It is detrimental.

suppressedID That is my secret Cap
04/15/16 6:46 am

For reference, Nietzsche describes "bad conscience" as the instincts of cruelty, hostility and destruction.

These characterized our pre-historic lives had to be suppressed when we entered into society. Now people have no rightful outlet for them; exercising them violated rules of civilized society.

Reply