The democrats on the FEC board tried to deny a conservative filmmaker the same media exemption that they gave to liberal media such as Michael Moore and Daily Kos. Do you find it acceptable to apply rules based on political leanings?
Sen if you think this is just a case of someone breaking the rules then you are either not thinking for yourself or you support these left wing tactics to suppress conservative speech. I am guessing the latter.
When you take an ass and add a cyst it becomes annoying. So many people choose to pop the cyst. I am not sure if that can be applied here because I'm not sure if you are the cyst or the ass, but you are annoying.
Nema ... what's fascinating is that Seneca is all bent about the shortening of his/her/it's handle, yet has no problem throwing their own comments out addressed to nobody, forcing the rest of us to sort them out.
Sen ... I can understand that you'd do anything to avoid answering my question. It's what the leftists on SoH do to avoid the truth.
-Nemacyst- Maybe you insecurities require you to repeat yourself because the people around you choose to not listen to you. I can clearly see why. I heard you the first time but if it makes you feel morally superior to latch on to the same idea and repeat it over and over like a kindergartener please indulge yourself. Maybe I should get you a juice box and your blankey.
Sen ... you clear don't understand. I have no sense of entitlement. If you childish choose to avoid answering the question then everyone here is able to see for themselves.
He applied for the exemption AFTER he violated the rules. We should be talking about the three republicans who voted along party lines, not the democrats that followed the rules.
Paula defends any left wing agenda and tactics until the end. These rules are a grey area and ridiculous to start with and is a usual left wing tactic to have a system so vague that they can decide who the rules apply to and who they don't.
If you guys knew anything about the film industry you know that if you want a media exemption you file for it BEFORE you start producing the film. Not after the film is already in progress, just like I assume Michael Moore and other movie directors follow. Since they follow protocol, they are not subject to sanctions.
You're right Nemacyst, thank god a Muslim isn't running for POTUS or else I would have to vote for him! 😒
Thanks for providing zero proof for your conservative bias and any evidence proving his innocence. You should take your "Because he's a conservative!!!" argument to the Supreme Court. 😉
Isn't it a hate crime if you don't vote for the Muslim though? Or is it a hate crime if you don't vote for the openly transgender candidate? So many minorities I don't know which one to pick!
And that's the problem with conservatives. You guys never give a damn about minorities and they never put minority issues in your party platform. Then you wonder why 80% of minorities vote Democrat.
Yeah I read that ditsy little article. Don't you think it's weird that they didn't provide any specific details? Who's on the committee? What were the complaints? Did they ask the committee why they voted that way? Nope. Just poor reporting and failing to cover the entire story. All you read was "Conservative lost a committee hearing" and you immediately jumped on it without any question, even though you must've read about how he filed for the exemption AFTER he committed the infractions? Hmmmm......
Paul ... nice try at rewriting history! You called out the Republicans for "voting along party lines". The key is that the Democrats ignored the injustice they were committing and voted along party lines, and hypocritically inconsistent with their earlier rulings. The Republicans supported the rights of free speech, the Democrats voted to crush free speech.
If he filed his paperwork on time like Michael Moore did, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Here's the difference.
This guy, filed for exemptions after complaints were filed against him. Liberal filmmakers like Michael Moore followed FEC protocol and receives exemptions before his movie was produced, before complaints are filed against him.
Paul ... are you the one attempting to justify the clearly partisan and capricious response of the Democrats on this board? Are you the one who is suggesting that Mr Moore followed the "protocol" while others didn't?
If the answer is yes, then the burden to prove your assertions rests with you!
Paul ... as for the second link, did you actually read it? It shows that Mr Moore is a habitual abuser of these FEC "protocols".
Your "evidence" only reinforces the point that the Democrats capriciously decided this one. Their intent was to prevent an accurate yet unflattering portrayal of MrO to come to light.
Paul ... you are SO funny! Leave it to leftists to define "fatherhood" as a momentary biological deposit!
Do you really think that by abandoning his son that Barrack Senior was fulfilling his fatherhood? And when the coward left, providing no financial or moral support, did any others step in to partially fill the father figure role? And did those who stepped in have any impact on MrO?
I really find it hard to believe that you are THIS naive!
Show of Hands
Comments: Add Comment