patberk99
04/30/16 11:26 am
Absolutely not, gun ownership is a vital part to maintain a strong, healthy society, as well as protection from a tyrannical government.
hack355
04/15/16 7:09 am
1Holy fuck go fuck yourself wow
2 the 2nd amendment should be the first
3 in the free speech amendment would say free speech about everything but the banning of firearms just a whisper should be punishable
coloradical Vote or Shut Up
04/08/16 12:36 am
China, Germany, Russia & many more Socialist Nations Made Firearms Illegal for regular citizens to posses except for Military and Law Enforcement. Then they Slaughtered over 100,000,000 (one hundred million) people who they didn't agree with or who stood in the way of "progress".
txhntr
04/07/16 5:50 pm
... "and the sheeple were rounded up and everything was taken away from them"...
Yes Virginia, Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Toaster Merica
04/06/16 2:33 pm
When the 2nd admendment was drafted it was for muskets and sabres, simple weapons for self defense. They did not make it for heavy automatic weapons that could wipe out an entire shopping mall. Wake up America, wake up dammit.
Pres55555 Gone.
04/05/16 7:16 pm
To the people that think banning guns will get rid of he problem, let me ask you this: when was the last time meth or cocaine was sold on store shelves?
Spiritof76 USA 1776
04/05/16 4:37 pm
4% of Libertarians please explain yourselves. Who would have the right to make it illegal for private, law-abiding citizens to own guns, when the government could have all the guns it wants?
rambo088 kansas
04/05/16 3:40 pm
The right of citizens to own and carry any type of arms, including but not limited to: firearms, blades and energy weapons (gotta think ahead) shall not be infringed.
shygal47 Florida east coast
04/05/16 1:13 pm
No, I wouldn't make it illegal ... but I would add a clause or two to deny minors access to fully automatic weapons, and that each state has the right to specify the types of firearms allowed within it's borders.
CDUBS Dallas, Tx
04/05/16 12:18 pm
Mine would state:
"You have the responsibility to bear arms".
Pistols, rifles, military style, and yes sawed off would get you a tax break. All you hippies are wrong.
DawnDanes New Jersey
04/05/16 12:10 pm
No, but regular not sawed off shotguns would be the only "legal" gun allowed. Absolutely no automatic weapons or handguns. Various other countries have survived hundreds of years without such weapons in the hands of private citizens.
DawnDanes New Jersey
04/05/16 12:10 pm
No, but regular not sawed off shotguns would be the only "legal" gun allowed. Absolutely no automatic weapons or handguns. Various other countries have survived hundreds of years without such weapons in the hands of private citizens.
tractorman Oklahoma
04/05/16 12:07 pm
Hunting rifles and shotguns, no. Handguns, military style weapons, and large clip weapons definitely off the streets would make life better in Merica.
PrinceDaemon The Bloodwyrm
04/05/16 12:04 pm
If I am writing a new Constitution, gun control will be strictly enforced to highest degree. Is it to keep America safe? Not really. Its to keep me safe because the rest of the Constitution will be vesting absolute power in myself.
arctostaphylos Ankh Morpork, New York
04/05/16 12:03 pm
Of course not. It's crucial that a population be readily able to arm itself against a tyrannical government or oppressive power structures. A government should be afraid of its constituents, not the other way around.
I'd prefer more thorough licensing and registration, though, to track the routes through which criminals acquire their weapons, but that'll be a moot point in the next decade or so as 3D printing of firearms becomes more feasible.
Widespread firearm use training could also be beneficial, but probably not through constitutional mandate.
Comments: Add Comment