Show of HandsShow of Hands

DerekWills December 18th, 2015 11:10pm

Should live audiences be done away with at Presidential Debates?

14 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

MrMilkdud
12/19/15 7:19 am

No, they just need better security and a lower tolerance for dipshits who try to disturb the event.

Reply
drkwrl
12/18/15 8:17 pm

Applause lines are so fucking annoying. Popularity does not equal a good argument

Reply
liam2013 iowa
12/18/15 7:32 pm

I like the occasional boos and disruptions from the crowd.

Reply
suppressedID IMEACH BIDEN
12/18/15 7:18 pm

Its government for the people.

Reply
badgerben Las Vegas
12/18/15 6:16 pm

I like the audience for the overall transparency of the event but I do prefer the presidential debates where the audience must remain silent.

Reply
miyo97 Zoo Town
12/18/15 5:25 pm

Yes because then we'd get real answers, not claims that are just made for applause.

Reply
DerekWills Lone Star Gun Rights
12/18/15 4:35 pm

I say yes. These candidates are trying to answer important questions in a very limited amount of time and these imbeciles that are hooting and hollering don't do anything but make that take longer.

Reply
political Georgia
12/18/15 9:16 pm

They were clapping for amnesty and increasing spending last time.

JDoe Its a gift
12/18/15 4:34 pm

At the Republican debate at the University of Colorado in Boulder, there was almost no audience. It wasn't clear why the even went to the trouble of holding the event here. Students couldn't attend.

Reply