Why is it that when one calls an radical Islamic terrorist a radical Islamic terrorist, others come out and talk about peaceful Muslims? Nobody said anything about peaceful Muslims. It's purely about the radicals, clearly.
White ppl like to come to the rescue of brown pll
Because society has been conditioned to blindly accept all people are good instead of thinking
Becuz it is a crime worthy of utter social ostracism to so much as *appear* to minimize or attack any group or subgroup by stating ugly facts. It violates the psychological indoctrination of negative thinking designed to cripple healthy dialogue & interaction.
The people obsessed over that term make no such distinction.
Because empty suits like the current GOPer front runner don't make the distinction, and neither do the 75% of the GOPers polled who agree with him on the issue, apparently.
It's obviously a political ploy. People are more afraid of coming off as islamaphobic then they are of actual terrorists.
We're easily confused, obviously.
Some have an agenda...they purposely fail to distinguish between peaceful and radical Muslims...same way no differentiation between legal and illegal aliens....the PC culture caused 14 to die in San Bernadino...how many more?
Malik: I'm aligned with Islamic State.
ISIS: Malik & Farook are aligned with Islamic State.
Obama: Their motives are still a mystery.
Liberalism is a mental disorder. Period.
Damn it cowboy, why can't you just add to the discussion? You say that all the time. It literally adds nothing to garner a discussion.
Once you recognize the mental disorder, we can work on how to fix the problem. Being ignorant of the problem doesn't make it go away. We can discuss the white guilt Liberals feel or we can discuss their non-existent white privilege all day long. I'd rather get to the root of the problem. If you want to ask questions like this, you should be prepared to get logical answers.
I swear Cowboy sounds like one of those people on those PBS telethons. "if you call in now, we can help those liberals get over this disorder by contributing $5, $10, $50, $100, $1,000 right now."
Democrats have a default setting that compels them to side with any group that complains against the US.
We need to stop encouraging any religion, period. When anyone says that there is a "supreme being" whose morality ranks ABOVE anything we humans think, it sets a very dangerous stage. Because then we are encouraging the idea that you can and should commit acts that the "supreme being" wants, even if society, laws, and even you yourself find those acts reprehensible. I know religion has "good parts," but if we are going to try to promote the "good stuff" only, then we might as well admit that there are no perfect holy books and treat them as philosophical literature, which they are.
Address radical Islam specifically please.
I don't even need to say anything, Brigitte Gabriel says all that needs to be said on the matter.
This nonsense has to stop at some point. The safety of our citizens should be a priority. If it's not...
Get your priorities checked.
What in the hell are people thinking these days?
If you believe the government will properly "screen" these refugees riddle me this...
The radical Islamist couple from this latest attack were supposedly "screened".
Everyone agrees that the only thing government is efficient at is being inefficient, yet some choose to believe THIS time will be different. THIS time they'll get it right.
I'm not willing to gamble with our citizens lives like that.
It's insanity. It really is. What's the proposed number up to now?
100,000 in three years?
If 1% are radicals, that's 100 radicals.
It only took 19 for 9/11.
It only took 2 in California.
It literally has me asking: what the hell is wrong with people?