Do you think people should be allowed to do what they want as long as it doesn't harm someone or something besides them self?
I only said no because I think "harm" doesn't cover it all. For example, if I threaten your life, that should also be considered immoral even though I am not directly harming you.
No no they have to pose a legitimate threat. Some extreme libertarians justify torture with this is the terrorist hasn't actually killed anyone but is confirmed to know something about a future attack.